“Volume-aware design of composite molds” by Alderighi, Malomo, Giorgi, Bickel, Cignoni, et al. …
Conference:
Type:
Title:
- Volume-aware design of composite molds
Session/Category Title: Fabricated Results
Presenter(s)/Author(s):
Abstract:
We propose a novel technique for the automatic design of molds to cast highly complex shapes. The technique generates composite, two-piece molds. Each mold piece is made up of a hard plastic shell and a flexible silicone part. Thanks to the thin, soft, and smartly shaped silicone part, which is kept in place by a hard plastic shell, we can cast objects of unprecedented complexity. An innovative algorithm based on a volumetric analysis defines the layout of the internal cuts in the silicone mold part. Our approach can robustly handle thin protruding features and intertwined topologies that have caused previous methods to fail. We compare our results with state of the art techniques, and we demonstrate the casting of shapes with extremely complex geometry.
References:
1. Thomas Alderighi, Luigi Malomo, Daniela Giorgi, Nico Pietroni, Bernd Bickel, and Paolo Cignoni. 2018. Metamolds: Computational Design of Silicone Molds. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 136 (July 2018), 13 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
2. Amit H. Bermano, Thomas Funkhouser, and Szymon Rusinkiewicz. 2017. State of the Art in Methods and Representations for Fabrication-Aware Design. Comput. Graph. Forum 36, 2 (May 2017), 509–535. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. S. Biasotti, A. Cerri, D. Giorgi, and M. Spagnuolo. 2013. PHOG: Photometric and Geometric Functions for Textured Shape Retrieval. (2013), 13–22. Google ScholarDigital Library
4. Bernd Bickel, Paolo Cignoni, Luigi Malomo, and Nico Pietroni. 2018. State of the Art on Stylized Fabrication. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 6 (2018), 325–342.Google ScholarCross Ref
5. J. Bloomenthal. 1988. Polygonization of Implicit Surfaces. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 5, 4 (Nov. 1988), 341–355. Google ScholarDigital Library
6. Jules Bloomenthal and Keith Ferguson. 1995. Polygonization of Non-manifold Implicit Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ’95). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309–316. Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Kathleen S. Bonnell, Mark A. Duchaineau, Daniel R. Schikore, Bernd Hamann, and Kenneth I. Joy. 2003. Material Interface Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 9, 4 (Oct. 2003), 500–511. Google ScholarDigital Library
8. Pritam Chakraborty and N. Venkata Reddy. 2009. Automatic determination of parting directions, parting lines and surfaces for two-piece permanent molds. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209, 5 (2009), 2464 — 2476.Google ScholarCross Ref
9. B. R. de Araújo, Daniel S. Lopes, Pauline Jepp, Joaquim A. Jorge, and Brian Wyvill. 2015. A Survey on Implicit Surface Polygonization. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 4, Article 60 (May 2015), 39 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
10. Ernest P De Garmo, J Temple Black, and Ronald A Kohser. 2011. DeGarmo’s materials and processes in manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
11. H. Edelsbrunner, D. Letscher, and A. Zomorodian. 2000. Topological Persistence and Simplification. (2000), 454–. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=795666.796607 Google ScholarDigital Library
12. Sarah F. Frisken Gibson. 1998. Constrained Elastic Surface Nets: Generating Smooth Surfaces from Binary Segmented Data. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI ’98). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, 888–898. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646921.709482 Google ScholarDigital Library
13. Eric Hart. 2013. The Prop Building Guidebook: For Theatre, Film, and Tv. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
14. Philipp Herholz, Wojciech Matusik, and Marc Alexa. 2015. Approximating Free-form Geometry with Height Fields for Manufacturing. Comput. Graph. Forum 34, 2 (May 2015), 239–251. Google ScholarDigital Library
15. Yixin Hu, Qingnan Zhou, Xifeng Gao, Alec Jacobson, Denis Zorin, and Daniele Panozzo. 2018. Tetrahedral Meshing in the Wild. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 60 (July 2018), 14 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
16. Alan C. Lin and Nguyen Huu Quang. 2014. Automatic generation of mold-piece regions and parting curves for complex CAD models in multi-piece mold design. Computer-Aided Design 57 (2014), 15 — 28.Google ScholarCross Ref
17. Ligang Liu, Ariel Shamir, Charlie Wang, and Emily Whitening. 2014. 3D Printing Oriented Design: Geometry and Optimization. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Courses (SA ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
18. Luigi Malomo, Nico Pietroni, Bernd Bickel, and Paolo Cignoni. 2016. FlexMolds: Automatic Design of Flexible Shells for Molding. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 6, Article 223 (Nov. 2016), 12 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
19. J. Milnor. 1963. Morse Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
20. Ken Museth, Jeff Lait, John Johanson, Jeff Budsberg, Ron Henderson, Mihai Alden, Peter Cucka, David Hill, and Andrew Pearce. 2013. OpenVDB: An Open-source Data Structure and Toolkit for High-resolution Volumes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2013 Courses (SIGGRAPH ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 1 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
21. Kazutaka Nakashima, Thomas Auzinger, Emmanuel Iarussi, Ran Zhang, Takeo Igarashi, and Bernd Bickel. 2018. CoreCavity: Interactive Shell Decomposition for Fabrication with Two-piece Rigid Molds. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 4, Article 135 (July 2018), 13 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
22. Gregory M. Nielson and Richard Franke. 1997. Computing the Separating Surface for Segmented Data. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Visualization ’97 (VIS ’97). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 229–233. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=266989.267066 Google ScholarDigital Library
23. A. Medeiros e Sá, K. Rodriguez-Echavarria, N. Pietroni, and P. Cignoni. 2016. State of the Art on Functional Fabrication. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics for Digital Fabrication (GraDiFab ’16). Eurographics Association, Goslar Germany, Germany, 1–9. Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Christian Schüller, Daniele Panozzo, Anselm Grundhöfer, Henning Zimmer, Evgeni Sorkine, and Olga Sorkine-Hornung. 2016. Computational Thermoforming. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 4, Article 43 (July 2016), 9 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Hang Si. 2015. TetGen, a Delaunay-Based Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 41, 2, Article 11 (Feb. 2015), 36 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
26. Andrea Tagliasacchi, Thomas Delame, Michela Spagnuolo, Nina Amenta, and Alexandru Telea. 2016. 3D Skeletons: A State-of-the-art Report. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Graphics: State of the Art Reports (EG ’16). Eurographics Association, Goslar Germany, Germany, 573–597. Google ScholarDigital Library
27. G.M. Treece, R.W. Prager, and A.H. Gee. 1999. Regularised marching tetrahedra: improved iso-surface extraction. Computers and Graphics 23, 4 (1999), 583 — 598.Google ScholarCross Ref
28. Nobuyuki Umetani, Bernd Bickel, and Wojciech Matusik. 2015. Computational Tools for 3D Printing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Courses (SIGGRAPH ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 9. Google ScholarDigital Library
29. Somlak Wannarumon. 2011. Reviews of Computer-Aided Technologies for Jewelry Design and Casting. Naresuan University Engineering Journal 6, 1 (2011), 45–56.Google Scholar
30. Chunjie Zhang, Xionghui Zhou, and Congxin Li. 2010. Feature extraction from freeform molded parts for moldability analysis. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 48, 1 (01 Apr 2010), 273–282.Google ScholarCross Ref
31. Qingnan Zhou, Eitan Grinspun, Denis Zorin, and Alec Jacobson. 2016. Mesh Arrangements for Solid Geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 4, Article 39 (July 2016), 15 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
