“Visual Anecdote” by Offenhuber

Conference:


Title:

    Visual Anecdote

Presenter(s):



Abstract:


    The discourse on information visualization often remains limited to the exploratory function -its potential for discovering patterns in the data. However, visual representations also have a rhetorical function: they demonstrate, persuade, and facilitate communication.

    In observing how visualization is used in presentations and discussions, I often notice the use of what could be called “visual anecdotes.” Small narratives are tied to individual data points in the visualization, giving human context to the data and rooting the abstract representation in personal experience. This paper argues that these narratives are more than just illustrations of the dataset; they constitute a central epistemological element of the visualization. By considering these narrative elements as parts of the visualization, its design and knowledge organization appear in a different light.

    This paper investigates how the “story” of data representation is delivered. By means of ethnographic interviews and observations, the author highlights the different aspects of the visual anecdote, a specific point where the exploratory and the rhetorical functions of visualization meet.

References:


    1. S.K. Card, J.D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman, Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999).

    2. E.R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press, 2001).

    3. B. Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    4. C. Chen, “Top IO Unsolved Information Visualization Problems,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 25, 12-16 (2005).

    5. D. Kaiser, “Stick-Figure Realism: Conventions, Reification, and the Persistence of Feynman Diagrams, 1948-1964,” Representations, 49-86 (2000).

    6. D. Kaiser [5]. 7. J. Gallop, Anecdotal Theory (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2002).

    8. C.F. Chabris and S.M. Kosslyn, “Representational Correspondence as a Basic Principle of Diagram Design,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3426, 36 (2005).

    9. K.S. McLeod, “Our Sense of Snow: The Myth of John Snow in Medical Geography,” Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 50, 923-935 (2000).

    IO. H. Brody et al., “Map-Making and Myth-Making in Broad Street: the London Cholera Epidemic, 1854,” The Lancet, Vol. 356, No. 9223, 64-68 (2000).

    11. J. Gallop [7].

    12. SENSEable City Lab, www.senseable.mit.edu/.

    13. B. Latour [3].

    14. SENSEable City Lab, Obama I One People, February 2009, www.senseable.mit.edu/obama/.

    15. F. Calabrese and C. Ratti, “Real Time Rome,” Networks and Communication Studies, NETCOM, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, 247-257 (2006).

    16. F. Hartmann and E.K. Bauer, Bildersprache: Otto Neurath Visualisierungen, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Facultas. wuv Universitats, 2006).

    17. P. Baudisch et al., “Keeping Things in Context: A Comparative Evaluation of Focus Plus Context Screens, Overviews, and Zooming,” CHI ’02: Proceedings of the SIGGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM Press, 2002) 259-266.


Type:



Art Paper/Presentation Type: