“Procedural texturing of solid wood with knots” by Larsson, Ijiri, Yoshida, Huber, Fredriksson, et al. …

We present a procedural framework for modeling the annual ring pattern of solid wood with knots. Although wood texturing is a well-studied topic, there have been few previous attempts at modeling knots inside the wood texture. Our method takes the skeletal structure of a tree log as input and produces a three-dimensional scalar field representing the time of added growth, which defines the volumetric annual ring pattern. First, separate fields are computed around each strand of the skeleton, i.e., the stem and each knot. The strands are then merged into a single field using smooth minimums. We further suggest techniques for controlling the smooth minimum to adjust the balance of smoothness and reproduce the distortion effects observed around dead knots. Our method is implemented as a shader program running on a GPU with computation times of approximately 0.5 s per image and an input data size of 600 KB. We present rendered images of solid wood from pine and spruce as well as plywood and cross-laminated timber (CLT). Our results were evaluated by wood experts, who confirmed the plausibility of the rendered annual ring patterns.Link to code: https://github.com/marialarsson/procedural_knots.

1. Jean Philippe Andreu and Alfred Rinnhofer. 2003. Modeling knot geometry in norway spruce from industrial CT images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 2749 (2003). Google ScholarCross Ref
2. Baptiste Angles, Marco Tarini, Brian Wyvill, Loïc Barthe, and Andrea Tagliasacchi. 2017. Sketch-based implicit blending. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 36. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. Barbara Cutler, Julie Dorsey, Leonard McMillan, Matthias Müller, and Robert Jagnow. 2002. A procedural approach to authoring solid models. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH ’02. Google ScholarDigital Library
4. Jean Michel Dischler and Djamchid Ghazanfarpour. 1999. Interactive image-based modeling of macrostructured textures. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 19, 1 (1999). Google ScholarDigital Library
5. Ehren Choy. 2016. Smooth Signed Distance Field Textures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Carleton University, Ottawa.Google Scholar
6. Christina Foley. 2003. Modeling the effects of knots in Structural Timber. Ph.D. Dissertation. Lund University. https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/f026a551-2812-4539-98a2-0e7ee2ca4d5fGoogle Scholar
7. Forest Products Laboratory – USDA. 2010. Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material.Google Scholar
8. Geoffrey Y. Gardner. 1984. SIMULATION OF NATURAL SCENES USING TEXTURED QUADRIC SURFACES. Computer Graphics (ACM) 18, 3 (1984). Google ScholarDigital Library
9. Geoffrey Y. Gardner. 1985. VISUAL SIMULATION OF CLOUDS. Computer Graphics (ACM) 19, 3 (1985). Google ScholarDigital Library
10. Olivier Gourmel, Loic Barthe, Marie Paule Cani, Brian Wyvill, Adrien Bernhardt, Mathias Paulin, and Herbert Grasberger. 2013. A gradient-based implicit blend. ACM Transactions on Graphics 32, 2 (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
11. Anders Grönlund, Lars Björklund, Stig Grundberg, and Göran Berggren. 1995. Manual för furustambank. Technical Report. Luleå Technical University.Google Scholar
12. Philipp Henzler, Niloy J. Mitra, and Tobias Ritschel. 2020. Learning a Neural 3D Texture Space from 2D Exemplars. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 8353–8361. Google ScholarCross Ref
13. Takashi Ijiri, Shigeru Owada, and Takeo Igarashi. 2006. The sketch L-system: Global control of tree modeling using free-form strokes. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 4073 LNCS. Google ScholarCross Ref
14. Erik Johansson, Dennis Johansson, Johan Skog, and Magnus Fredriksson. 2013. Automated knot detection for high speed computed tomography on Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies (L.) Karst. using ellipse fitting in concentric surfaces. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
15. Johannes Kopf, Chi Wing Fu, Daniel Cohen-Or, Oliver Deussen, Dani Lischinski, and Tien Tsin Wong. 2007. Solid texture synthesis from 2D exemplars. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2007). Google ScholarDigital Library
16. J. Kratt, M. Spicker, A. Guayaquil, M. Fiser, S. Pirk, O. Deussen, J. C. Hart, and B. Benes. 2015. Woodification: User-Controlled Cambial Growth Modeling. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 34. Google ScholarDigital Library
17. Z. Lam and Scott A. King. 2005. Simulating tree growth based on internal and environmental factors. In Proceedings – GRAPHITE 2005 – 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and Southeast Asia. Google ScholarDigital Library
18. Aristid Lindenmayer. 1968. Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 18, 3 (1968). Google ScholarCross Ref
19. Albert Julius Liu, Zhao Dong, Miloš Hašan, and Steve Marschner. 2016. Simulating the structure and texture of solid wood. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2016). Google ScholarDigital Library
20. Joanne Mann, Mike Plank, and Andy Wilkins. 2006. Tree growth and wood formation — applications of anisotropic surface growth. In Proceedings of the Mathematics in Industry Study Group. 153–192.Google Scholar
21. Stephen R. Marschner, Stephen H. Westin, Adam Arbree, and Jonathan T. Moon. 2005. Measuring and modeling the appearance of finished wood. In ACM Transactions on Graphics. Google ScholarDigital Library
22. Guilherme N. Oliveira, Rafael P. Torchelsen, João L.D. Comba, Marcelo Walter, and Rui Bastos. 2010. Geotextures: A multi-source geodesic distance field approach for procedural texturing of complex meshes. In Proceedings – 23rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, SIBGRAPI 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
23. Darwyn R. Peachey. 1985. SOLID TEXTURING OF COMPLEX SURFACES. Computer Graphics (ACM) 19, 3 (1985). Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Ken Perlin. 1985. An Image Synthesizer. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ’85). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 287–296. Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Ken Perlin. 2002. Improving Noise. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (San Antonio, Texas) (SIGGRAPH ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 681–682. Google ScholarDigital Library
26. Bui Tuong Phong. 1975. Illumination for Computer Generated Pictures. Commun. ACM 18, 6 (1975). Google ScholarDigital Library
27. Sören Pirk, Ondrej Stava, Julian Kratt, Michel Abdul Massih Said, Boris Neubert, Radomír Měch, Bedrich Benes, and Oliver Deussen. 2012. Plastic trees: Interactive self-adapting botanical tree models. ACM Transactions on Graphics 31, 4 (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
28. Inigo Quilez. 2013. Smooth minimum. https://www.iquilezles.org/www/articles/smin/smin.htmGoogle Scholar
29. Damien Sellier, Michael J. Plank, and Jonathan J. Harrington. 2011. A mathematical framework for modelling cambial surface evolution using a level set method. Annals of Botany 108, 6 (2011). Google ScholarCross Ref
30. Kenshi Takayama, Makoto Okabe, Takashi Ijiri, and Takeo Igarashi. 2008. Lapped solid textures: Filling a model with anisotropic textures. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3 (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library