“Physically Based Simulation of Rainbows” by Sadeghi, Munoz, Laven, Jarosz, Seron, et al. …

In this article, we derive a physically-based model for simulating rainbows. Previous techniques for simulating rainbows have used either geometric optics (ray tracing) or Lorenz-Mie theory. Lorenz-Mie theory is by far the most accurate technique as it takes into account optical effects such as dispersion, polarization, interference, and diffraction. These effects are critical for simulating rainbows accurately. However, as Lorenz-Mie theory is restricted to scattering by spherical particles, it cannot be applied to real raindrops which are nonspherical, especially for larger raindrops. We present the first comprehensive technique for simulating the interaction of a wavefront of light with a physically-based water drop shape. Our technique is based on ray tracing extended to account for dispersion, polarization, interference, and diffraction. Our model matches Lorenz-Mie theory for spherical particles, but it also enables the accurate simulation of nonspherical particles. It can simulate many different rainbow phenomena including double rainbows and supernumerary bows. We show how the nonspherical raindrops influence the shape of the rainbows, and we provide a simulation of the rare twinned rainbow, which is believed to be caused by nonspherical water drops.

Airy, G. 1838. On the intensity of light in the neighbourhood of a caustic. Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 6, 379–403.Google Scholar
Beard, K. V. and Chuang, C. 1987. A new model for the equilibrium shape of raindrops. J. Atmosph. Sci. 44, 11, 1509–1524.Google ScholarCross Ref
Beard, K. V., Kubesh, R. J., and III, H. T. O. 1991. Laboratory measurements of small raindrop distortion. part i: Axis ratios and fall behavior. J. Atmosph. Sci. 48, 5, 698–710.Google ScholarCross Ref
Bohren, C. and Huffmann, D. 1983. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bringi, V., Chandrasekar, V., and Xiao, R. 1991. Raindrop axis ratios and size distributions in florida rainshafts:an assessment of multiparameter radar algorithms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 36, 3, 703–715.Google ScholarCross Ref
Collins, S. 1994. Adaptive splatting for specular to diffuse light transport. In Proceedings of the 5th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 119–135.Google Scholar
Frisvad, J. R., Christensen, N. J., and Falster, P. 2007a. The aristotelian rainbow: From philosophy to computer graphics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia (Graphite’07). ACM, New York, 119–128. Google ScholarDigital Library
Frisvad, J. R., Christensen, N. J., and Jensen, H. W. 2007b. Computing the scattering properties of participating media using lorenz-mie theory. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Papers. ACM, New York, 60. Google ScholarDigital Library
Gedzelman, S. 2008. Simulating rainbows in their atmospheric environment. Appl. Optics 47, 34, 176–181.Google ScholarCross Ref
Giancoli, D. C. 1989. Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gondek, J. S., Meyer, G. W., and Newman, J. G. 1994. Wavelength dependent reflectance functions. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Conference. ACM, New York, 213–220. Google ScholarDigital Library
Greenler, R. 1990. Rainbows, Halos, and Glories. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guy, S. and Soler, C. 2004. Graphics gems revisited. ACM Trans. Graph.Google ScholarDigital Library
Heckbert, P. S. and Hanrahan, P. 1984. Beam tracing polygonal objects. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 18, 119–127. Google ScholarDigital Library
Jackèl, D. and Walter, B. 1997. Modeling and rendering of the atmosphere using Mie-scattering. Comput. Graph. Forum 16, 4, 201–210.Google ScholarCross Ref
Jones, R. C. 1941. A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 31, 7, 488–493.Google ScholarCross Ref
Laven, P. 2003. Simulation of rainbows, coronas, and glories by use of Mie theory. Appl. Optics 42, 3, 436–444.Google ScholarCross Ref
Lee, R. L. 1998. Mie theory, Airy theory, and the natural rainbow. Appl. Optics 37, 9, 1506–1519.Google ScholarCross Ref
Lee, R. L. and Fraser, A. B. 2001. The Rainbow Bridge: Rainbows in Art, Myth, and Science. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Lipson, S., Lipson, H., and Tanhauser, D. 1995. Optical Physics, 3rd Ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lorenz, L. 1890. Lysbevgelser i og uden for en af plane lysblger belyst kugle. det kongelig danske videnskabernes selskabs skrifter. Rkke, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling 6, 1, 262.Google Scholar
Lynch, D. and Livingston, W. 2001. Color and Light in Nature, 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mie, G. 1908. Beitr age zur optik tr uber medien, speziell kolloidaler metall osungen. Annalen der Physik 25, 3, 377–445.Google ScholarCross Ref
Minnaert, M. 1993. Light and Colour in the Outdoors. Springer.Google Scholar
Mishchenko, M. I., Hovenier, J. W., and Travis, L. D. 2000. Light Scattering by Nonspherical Particles: Theory, Measurements, and Applications. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, F. K. 1989. Prisms and rainbows: A dispersion model for computer graphics. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. 227–234.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, S. G. and Nayar, S. K. 2003. Shedding light on the weather. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vol. 1. 665–672. Google ScholarDigital Library
nVIDIA. 2004. Rainbows and fogbows: adding natural phenomena. Sdk white paper.Google Scholar
Pope, R. and Fry, E. 1997. Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm) of pure water. ii. integrating cavity measurements. Appl. Optics 36, 33, 8710–8723.Google ScholarCross Ref
Riley, K., Ebert, D. S., Kraus, M., Tessendorf, J., and Hansen, C. 2004. Efficient rendering of atmospheric phenomena. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, D. Fellner and S. Spencer, Eds., 375–386. Google ScholarDigital Library
Rushmeier, H. 1995. Input for participating media. Realistic input for realistic images. In ACM SIGGRAPH’95 Course Notes. Also appeared in the ACM SIGGRAPH ’98 Course Notes – A Basic Guide to Global Illumination.Google Scholar
Taflove, A. 1998. Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Artech House Inc.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, D. C., Tannenbaum, P., and Wozny, M. J. 1994. Polarization and birefringency considerations in rendering. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’94). ACM, New York, 221–222. Google ScholarDigital Library
Umashankar, K. and Taflove, A. 1982. A novel method to analyze electromagnetic scattering of complex objects. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 24, 4, 397–405.Google ScholarCross Ref
van de Hulst, H. C. 1957. Light Scattering by Small Particles. Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. and Bossa, B. 2009. Nature Phys. 5, 697–702.Google Scholar
Wilkie, A., Tobler, R. F., and Purgathofer, W. 2001. Combined rendering of polarization and fluorescence effects. In Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques. Springer, 197–204. Google ScholarDigital Library
Wolff, L. B. and Kurlander, D. J. 1990. Ray tracing with polarization parameters. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 10, 44–55. Google ScholarDigital Library
Xu, F., Lock, J. A., and Tropea, C. 2010. Debye series for light scattering by a spheroid. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 4, 671–686.Google ScholarCross Ref
Yang, P. and Liou, K. N. 1995. Light scattering by hexagonal ice crystals: Comparison of finite-difference time domain and geometric optics models. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 12, 162–176.Google ScholarCross Ref
Yang, P. and Liou, K. N. 1996. Finite-Difference time domain method for light scattering by small ice crystals in three-dimensional space. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 13, 2072–2085.Google ScholarCross Ref
Yee, K. 1966. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans. Anten. Propagat. 14, 3, 302–307.Google ScholarCross Ref