“Exposing Photo Manipulation With Inconsistent Shadows” by Kee, O’Brien and Farid

  • ©Eric Kee, James F. O'Brien, and Hany Farid

Conference:


Type:


Title:

    Exposing Photo Manipulation With Inconsistent Shadows

Session/Category Title: Perception

Presenter(s)/Author(s):


Moderator(s):


Abstract:


    We describe a geometric technique to detect physically inconsistent arrangements of shadows in an image. This technique combines multiple constraints from cast and attached shadows to constrain the projected location of a point light source. The consistency of the shadows is posed as a linear programming problem. A feasible solution indicates that the collection of shadows is physically plausible, while a failure to find a solution provides evidence of photo tampering.

References:


    1. Farid, H. 2009. A survey of image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2, 26, 16–25.
    2. Farid, H. and Bravo, M. J. 2010. Image forensic analyses that elude the human visual system. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Media Forensics and Security.
    3. Jacobson, J. and Werner, S. 2004. Why cast shadows are expendable: Insensitivity of human observers and the inherent ambiguity of cast shadows in pictorial art. Percept. 33, 11, 1369–1383.
    4. Johnson, M. K. and Farid, H. 2005. Exposing digital forgeries by detecting inconsistencies in lighting. In Proceedings of the 7th Multimedia and Security Workshop. 1–10.
    5. Johnson, M. K. and Farid, H. 2007. Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security 3, 2, 450–461.
    6. Karsch, K., Hedau, V., Forsyth, D., and Hoiem, D. 2011. Rendering synthetic objects into legacy photographs. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia Conference. 157:1–157:12.
    7. Kee, E. and Farid, H. 2010. Exposing digital forgeries from 3-D lighting environments. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Forensics and Security.
    8. Khang, B.-G., Koenderink, J. J., and Kappers, A. 2006. Perception of illumination direction in images of 3-D convex objects: Influence of surface materials and light fields. Percept. 35, 5, 625–645.
    9. Koenderink, J. J., Pont, S., Van Doorn, A., Kappers, A., and Todd, J. 2007. The visual light field. Percept. 36, 11, 1595–1610.
    10. Koenderink, J. J., Van Doorn, A., and Pont, S. 2004. Light direction from shad(ow)ed random Gaussian surfaces. Percept. 33, 12, 1405–1420.
    11. Lalonde, J.-F., Efros, A. A., and Narasimhan, S. G. 2011. Estimating the natural illumination conditions from a single outdoor image. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
    12. Liu, Q., Cao, X., Deng, C., and Guo, X. 2011. Identifying image composites through shadow matte consistency. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 6, 3, 1111–1122.
    13. Mamassian, P. 2004. Impossible shadows and the shadow correspondence problem. Percept. 33, 11, 1279–1290.
    14. Nillius, P. and Eklundh, J.-O. 2001. Automatic estimation of the projected light source direction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
    15. Okabe, T., Sato, I., and Sato, Y. 2004. Spherical harmonics vs. haar wavelets: Basis for recovering illumination from cast shadows. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1. 50–57.
    16. O’Shea, J. P., Agrawala, M., and Banks, M. S. 2010. The influence of shape cues on the perception of lighting directions. J. Vis. 12, 10, 21:1–21.
    17. Ostrovsky, Y., Cavanagh, P., and Sinha, P. 2005. Perceiving illumination inconsistencies in scenes. Percept. 34, 1301–1314.
    18. Pont, S. and Koenderink, J. 2007. Matching illumination of solid objects. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 459–468.
    19. Ramamoorthi, R. and Hanrahan, P. 2001. An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’01). ACM Press, New York, 497–500.
    20. Sato, I., Sato, Y., and Ikeuchi, K. 2003. Illumination from shadows. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25, 3, 290–300.
    21. Shesh, A., Criminisi, A., Rother, C., and Smyth, G. 2009. 3Daware image editing for out of bounds photography. In Proceedings of the Graphics Interface Conference. 47–54.
    22. Stork, D. G. and Johnson, M. K. 2006. Estimating the location of illuminants in realist master paintings: Computer image analysis addresses a debate in art history of the baroque. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 255–258.
    23. Zhang, W., Cao, X., Zhang, J., Zhu, J., and Wang, P. 2009. Detecting photographic composites using shadows. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 1042–1045.

ACM Digital Library Publication:


Overview Page: