“CrossShade: shading concept sketches using cross-section curves” by Shao, Bousseau, Sheffer and Singh

  • ©Cloud Shao, Adrien Bousseau, Alla Sheffer, and Karan Singh




    CrossShade: shading concept sketches using cross-section curves



    We facilitate the creation of 3D-looking shaded production drawings from concept sketches. The key to our approach is a class of commonly used construction curves known as cross-sections, that function as an aid to both sketch creation and viewer understanding of the depicted 3D shape. In particular, intersections of these curves, or cross-hairs, convey valuable 3D information, that viewers compose into a mental model of the overall sketch. We use the artist-drawn cross-sections to automatically infer the 3D normals across the sketch, enabling 3D-like rendering.The technical contribution of our work is twofold. First, we distill artistic guidelines for drawing cross-sections and insights from perception literature to introduce an explicit mathematical formulation of the relationships between cross-section curves and the geometry they aim to convey. We then use these relationships to develop an algorithm for estimating a normal field from cross-section curve networks and other curves present in concept sketches. We validate our formulation and algorithm through a user study and a ground truth normal comparison. As demonstrated by the examples throughout the paper, these contributions enable us to shade a wide range of concept sketches with a variety of rendering styles.


    1. Andre, A., and Saito, S. 2011. Single-view sketch based modeling. In Proc. Symp. on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling. Google ScholarDigital Library
    2. Andre, A., Saito, S., and Nakajima, M. 2007. Crosssketch: freeform surface modeling with details. In Proc. Symp. on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, 45–52. Google ScholarDigital Library
    3. Bae, S., Balakrishnan, R., and Singh, K. 2008. ILoveSketch: as-natural-as-possible sketching system for creating 3d curve models. In Proc. User Interface Software and Technology. Google ScholarDigital Library
    4. Biard, L., Farouki, R. T., and Szafran, N. 2010. Construction of rational surface patches bounded by lines of curvature. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 27, 359–371. Google ScholarDigital Library
    5. Cole, F., Sanik, K., DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Funkhouser, T., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Singh, M. 2009. How well do line drawings depict shape? ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. of SIGGRAPH) 28, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    6. Cook, R. 2008. Behind the scenes at pixar. In Keynote talk, Siggraph Asia.Google Scholar
    7. Cooper, M. 2008. Line Drawing Interpretation. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
    8. do Carmo, M. P. 1976. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
    9. Ecker, A., Kutulakos, K., and Jepson, A. 2007. Shape from planar curves: A linear escape from flatland. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google Scholar
    10. Eissen, K., and Steur, R. 2008. Sketching: Drawing Techniques for Product Designers. Bis Publishers.Google Scholar
    11. Eissen, K., and Steur, R. 2011. Sketching: The Basics. Bis Publishers.Google Scholar
    12. Farin, G., and Hansford, D. 1999. Discrete coons patches. Computer Aided Geometric Design 16 (August), 691–700. Google ScholarDigital Library
    13. Finch, M., Snyder, J., and Hoppe, H. 2011. Freeform vector graphics with controlled thin-plate splines. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) 30. Google ScholarDigital Library
    14. Gangnet, M., Hervé, J.-C., Pudet, T., and van Thong, J.-M. 1989. Incremental computation of planar maps. SIGGRAPH 23 (July), 345–354. Google ScholarDigital Library
    15. Gingold, Y., Igarashi, T., and Zorin, D. 2009. Structured annotations for 2D-to-3D modeling. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) 28, 5. Google ScholarDigital Library
    16. Gooch, A., Gooch, B., Shirley, P., and Cohen, E. 1998. A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration. SIGGRAPH, 447–452. Google ScholarDigital Library
    17. Igarashi, T., Matsuoka, S., and Tanaka, H. 1999. Teddy: a sketching interface for 3d freeform design. SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarDigital Library
    18. Johnston, S. F. 2002. Lumo: illumination for cel animation. In Proc. Symp. on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering. Google ScholarDigital Library
    19. Joshi, P., and Carr, N. A. 2008. Repoussé: Automatic inflation of 2d artwork. In Proc. of Sketch Based Interfaces and Modeling. Google ScholarDigital Library
    20. Knill, D. C. 1992. Perception of surface contours and surface shape: from computation to psychophysics. Journal of Optical Society of America 9, 9, 1449–1464.Google ScholarCross Ref
    21. Koenderink, J. J., Doorn, A. J. V., and Kappers, A. M. L. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 487–496.Google Scholar
    22. Lipson, H., and Shpitalni, M. 1996. Optimization-based reconstruction of a 3d object from a single freehand line drawing. Computer-Aided Design 28, 651–663.Google ScholarCross Ref
    23. Malik, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 1, 73–103.Google ScholarDigital Library
    24. Mamassian, P., and Landy, M. S. 1998. Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision research 38, 18, 2817–2832.Google Scholar
    25. McCrae, J., Singh, K., and Mitra, N. J. 2011. Slices: A shape-proxy based on planar sections. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) 30, 6. Google ScholarDigital Library
    26. Nasri, A., Sabin, M., and Yasseen, Z. 2009. Filling N -Sided Regions by Quad Meshes for Subdivision Surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 28, 6 (Sept.), 1644–1658.Google ScholarCross Ref
    27. Nealen, A., Igarashi, T., Sorkine, O., and Alexa, M. 2007. Fibermesh: designing freeform surfaces with 3d curves. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 26 (July). Google ScholarDigital Library
    28. Okabe, M., Zeng, G., Matsushita, Y., Igarashi, T., Quan, L., and yeung Shum, H. 2006. Single-view relighting with normal map painting. In Proc. Pacific Graphics, 27–34.Google Scholar
    29. Olsen, L., Samavati, F., Sousa, M., and Jorge, J. 2009. Sketch-based modeling: A survey. Computers & Graphics 33. Google ScholarDigital Library
    30. Orzan, A., Bousseau, A., Winnemöller, H., Barla, P., Thollot, J., and Salesin, D. 2008. Diffusion curves: A vector representation for smooth-shaded images. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 27. Google ScholarDigital Library
    31. Pipes, A. 2007. Drawing for Designers. Laurence King.Google Scholar
    32. Robertson, S. 2003. How to Draw Cars the Hot Wheels Way. MBI.Google Scholar
    33. Schmidt, R., Khan, A., Kurtenbach, G., and Singh, K. 2009. On expert performance in 3D curve-drawing tasks. In Proc. Symp. Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling. Google ScholarDigital Library
    34. Schmidt, R., Khan, A., Singh, K., and Kurtenbach, G. 2009. Analytic drawing of 3d scaffolds. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) 28, 5. Google ScholarDigital Library
    35. Stevens, K. A. 1981. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence 17.Google Scholar
    36. Sýkora, D., Dingliana, J., and Collins, S. 2009. Lazy-Brush: Flexible painting tool for hand-drawn cartoons. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAPHICS) 28, 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
    37. Winnemöller, H., Orzan, A., Boissieux, L., and Thollot, J. 2009. Texture design and draping in 2d images. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Symp. on Rendering) 28, 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
    38. Wu, T.-P., Tang, C.-K., Brown, M. S., and Shum, H.-Y. 2007. Shapepalettes: interactive normal transfer via sketching. ACM Trans. on Graph. (Proc. of SIGGRAPH) 26. Google ScholarDigital Library
    39. Zhang, L., Dugas-Phocion, G., Samson, J.-S., and Seitz, S. M. 2002. Single view modeling of free-form scenes. In IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 990–997.Google Scholar

ACM Digital Library Publication:

Overview Page: