“Advanced procedural modeling of architecture” by Schwarz and Müller

  • ©Michael Schwarz and Pascal Müller




    Advanced procedural modeling of architecture



    We present the novel grammar language CGA++ for the procedural modeling of architecture. While existing grammar-based approaches can produce stunning results, they are limited in what modeling scenarios can be realized. In particular, many context-sensitive tasks are precluded, not least because within the rules specifying how one shape is refined, the necessary knowledge about other shapes is not available. Transcending such limitations, CGA++ significantly raises the expressiveness and offers a generic and integrated solution for many advanced procedural modeling problems. Pivotally, CGA++ grants first-class citizenship to shapes, enabling, within a grammar, directly accessing shapes and shape trees, operations on multiple shapes, rewriting shape (sub)trees, and spawning new trees (e.g., to explore multiple alternatives). The new linguistic device of events allows coordination across multiple shapes, featuring powerful dynamic grouping and synchronization. Various examples illustrate CGA++, demonstrating solutions to previously infeasible modeling challenges.


    1. Barroso, S., Besuievsky, G., and Patow, G. 2013. Visual copy & paste for procedurally modeled buildings by ruleset rewriting. Computers & Graphics 37, 4, 238–246. Google ScholarDigital Library
    2. BeneŠ, B., Št’ava, O., Měch, R., and Miller, G. 2011. Guided procedural modeling. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 2, 325–334.Google ScholarCross Ref
    3. Esri, 2014. Esri CityEngine 2014.1.Google Scholar
    4. Esri, 2015. CGA shape grammar reference. http://cehelp.esri.com/help/topic/com.procedural.cityengine.help/html/cgareference/cgaindex.html.Google Scholar
    5. Havemann, S. 2005. Generative Mesh Modeling. PhD thesis, TU Braunschweig.Google Scholar
    6. Krecklau, L., and Kobbelt, L. 2011. Procedural modeling of inter-connected structures. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 2, 335–344.Google ScholarCross Ref
    7. Krecklau, L., Pavic, D., and Kobbelt, L. 2010. Generalized use of non-terminal symbols for procedural modeling. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 8, 2291–2303.Google ScholarCross Ref
    8. Liew, H. 2004. SGML: A Meta-Language for Shape Grammars. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google ScholarDigital Library
    9. Lipp, M.,Wonka, P., and Wimmer, M. 2008. Interactive visual editing of grammars for procedural architecture. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3, 102:1–102:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
    10. Měch, R., and Prusinkiewicz, P. 1996. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 96, 397–410. Google ScholarDigital Library
    11. Müller, P., Wonka, P., Haegler, S., Ulmer, A., and Gool, L. V. 2006. Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Transactions on Graphics 25, 3, 614–623. Google ScholarDigital Library
    12. Parish, Y. I. H., and Müller, P. 2001. Procedural modeling of cities. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 301–308. Google ScholarDigital Library
    13. Patow, G. 2012. User-friendly graph editing for procedural modeling of buildings. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 32, 2, 66–75. Google ScholarDigital Library
    14. Prusinkiewicz, P., and Lindenmayer, A. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer-Verlag, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
    15. Prusinkiewicz, P., James, M., and Měch, R. 1994. Synthetic topiary. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 94, 351–358. Google ScholarDigital Library
    16. Prusinkiewicz, P., Mündermann, L., Karwowski, R., and Lane, B. 2001. The use of positional information in the modeling of plants. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 289–300. Google ScholarDigital Library
    17. Schwarz, M., and Wonka, P. 2014. Procedural design of exterior lighting for buildings with complex constraints. ACM Transactions on Graphics 33, 5, 166:1–166:16. Google ScholarDigital Library
    18. Steinberger, M., Kenzel, M., Kainz, B., Müller, J., Wonka, P., and Schmalstieg, D. 2014. Parallel generation of architecture on the GPU. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 2, 73–82. Google ScholarDigital Library
    19. Stiny, G., and Gips, J. 1972. Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In Information Processing 71, 1460–1465.Google Scholar
    20. Stiny, G. 1980. Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and Planning B 7, 3, 343–351.Google ScholarCross Ref
    21. Stiny, G. 1982. Spatial relations and grammars. Environment and Planning B 9, 1, 113–114.Google ScholarCross Ref
    22. Stiny, G. 2006. Shape: Talking about Seeing and Doing. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
    23. Thaller, W., Krispel, U., Zmugg, R., Havemann, S., and Fellner, D. W. 2013. Shape grammars on convex polyhedra. Computers & Graphics 37, 6, 707–717. Google ScholarDigital Library
    24. Whiting, E., Ochsendorf, J., and Durand, F. 2009. Procedural modeling of structurally-sound masonry buildings. ACM Transactions on Graphics 28, 5, 112:1–112:9. Google ScholarDigital Library
    25. Wonka, P., Wimmer, M., Sillion, F. X., and Ribarsky, W. 2003. Instant architecture. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22, 3, 669–677. Google ScholarDigital Library

ACM Digital Library Publication:

Overview Page: