“tempoGAN: a temporally coherent, volumetric GAN for super-resolution fluid flow” by Xie, Frankz, Chu and Thuerey
Conference:
Type(s):
Entry Number: 95
Title:
- tempoGAN: a temporally coherent, volumetric GAN for super-resolution fluid flow
Session/Category Title: Fluids 2: Vortex Boogaloo
Presenter(s)/Author(s):
Moderator(s):
Abstract:
We propose a temporally coherent generative model addressing the super-resolution problem for fluid flows. Our work represents a first approach to synthesize four-dimensional physics fields with neural networks. Based on a conditional generative adversarial network that is designed for the inference of three-dimensional volumetric data, our model generates consistent and detailed results by using a novel temporal discriminator, in addition to the commonly used spatial one. Our experiments show that the generator is able to infer more realistic high-resolution details by using additional physical quantities, such as low-resolution velocities or vorticities. Besides improvements in the training process and in the generated outputs, these inputs offer means for artistic control as well. We additionally employ a physics-aware data augmentation step, which is crucial to avoid overfitting and to reduce memory requirements. In this way, our network learns to generate adverted quantities with highly detailed, realistic, and temporally coherent features. Our method works instantaneously, using only a single time-step of low-resolution fluid data. We demonstrate the abilities of our method using a variety of complex inputs and applications in two and three dimensions.
References:
1. Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. 2017. Wasserstein GAN. arXiv:1701.07875 (2017).Google Scholar
2. Steve Bako, Thijs Vogels, Brian McWilliams, Mark Meyer, Jan NováK, Alex Harvill, Pradeep Sen, Tony Derose, and Fabrice Rousselle. 2017. Kernel-predicting convolutional networks for denoising Monte Carlo renderings. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 97. Google ScholarDigital Library
3. David Berthelot, Tom Schumm, and Luke Metz. 2017. BeGAN: Boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1703.10717 (2017).Google Scholar
4. Prateep Bhattacharjee and Sukhendu Das. 2017. Temporal Coherency based Criteria for Predicting Video Frames using Deep Multi-stage Generative Adversarial Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4271–4280.Google Scholar
5. Christopher M. Bishop. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
6. Chakravarty Alla Chaitanya, Anton Kaplanyan, Christoph Schied, Marco Salvi, Aaron Lefohn, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Timo Aila. 2017. Interactive reconstruction of Monte Carlo image sequences using a recurrent denoising autoencoder. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 36, 4 (2017), 98. Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Dongdong Chen, Jing Liao, Lu Yuan, Nenghai Yu, and Gang Hua. 2017. Coherent Online Video Style Transfer. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).Google Scholar
8. Mengyu Chu and Nils Thuerey. 2017. Data-Driven Synthesis of Smoke Flows with CNN-based Feature Descriptors. ACM Trans. Graph. 36(4), 69 (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
9. Emmanuel de Bezenac, Arthur Pajot, and Patrick Gallinari. 2017. Deep Learning for Physical Processes: Incorporating Prior Scientific Knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.07970 (2017).Google Scholar
10. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. 2016. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 2 (2016), 295–307. Google ScholarDigital Library
11. Alexey Dosovitskiy and Thomas Brox. 2016. Generating images with perceptual similarity metrics based on deep networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 658–666. Google ScholarDigital Library
12. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Philipp Fischer, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Martin Riedmiller, and Thomas Brox. 2016. Discriminative unsupervised feature learning with exemplar convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Mach. Int. 38, 9 (2016), 1734–1747.Google ScholarDigital Library
13. Amir Barati Farimani, Joseph Gomes, and Vijay S Pande. 2017. Deep Learning the Physics of Transport Phenomena. arXiv:1709.02432 (2017).Google Scholar
14. John Flynn, Ivan Neulander, James Philbin, and Noah Snavely. 2016. DeepStereo: Learning to predict new views from the world’s imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5515–5524.Google Scholar
15. Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. 2014. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proc. of IEEE Comp. Vision and Pattern Rec. IEEE, 580–587. Google ScholarDigital Library
16. Ian Goodfellow. 2016. NIPS 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.00160 (2016).Google Scholar
17. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
18. Ian J Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative Adversarial Nets. stat 1050 (2014), 10.Google Scholar
19. Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros. 2017. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. Proc. of IEEE Comp. Vision and Pattern Rec. (2017).Google ScholarCross Ref
20. Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. 2016. Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 694–711.Google ScholarCross Ref
21. Simon Kallweit, Thomas Müller, Brian McWilliams, Markus Gross, and Jan Novák. 2017. Deep Scattering: Rendering Atmospheric Clouds with Radiance-Predicting Neural Networks. arXiv:1709.05418 (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
22. Tero Karras, Timo Aila, Samuli Laine, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2017. Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv:1710.10196 (2017).Google Scholar
23. Ladislav Kavan, Dan Gerszewski, Adam W Bargteil, and Peter-Pike Sloan. 2011. Physics-inspired upsampling for cloth simulation in games. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 30. ACM, 93. Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Byungmoon Kim, Yingjie Liu, Ignacio Llamas, and Jarek Rossignac. 2005. FlowFixer: Using BFECC for Fluid Simulation. In Proceedings of the First Eurographics conference on Natural Phenomena. 51–56. Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. 2016. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1646–1654.Google ScholarCross Ref
26. Theodore Kim, Nils Thuerey, Doug James, and Markus Gross. 2008. Wavelet Turbulence for Fluid Simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 27 (3) (2008), 50:1–6. Google ScholarDigital Library
27. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. NIPS, 1097–1105. Google ScholarDigital Library
28. Lubor Ladicky, SoHyeon Jeong, Barbara Solenthaler, Marc Pollefeys, and Markus Gross. 2015. Data-driven fluid simulations using regression forests. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6 (2015), 199. Google ScholarDigital Library
29. Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. 2016. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv:1609.04802 (2016).Google Scholar
30. Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. 2017. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proc. of IEEE Comp. Vision and Pattern Rec., Vol. 1. 3.Google Scholar
31. Ding Liu, Zhaowen Wang, Yuchen Fan, Xianming Liu, Zhangyang Wang, Shiyu Chang, and Thomas Huang. 2017. Robust Video Super-Resolution With Learned Temporal Dynamics. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).Google Scholar
32. Zichao Long, Yiping Lu, Xianzhong Ma, and Bin Dong. 2017. PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Data. arXiv:1710.09668 (2017).Google Scholar
33. Fujun Luan, Sylvain Paris, Eli Shechtman, and Kavita Bala. 2017. Deep Photo Style Transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07511 (2017).Google Scholar
34. W Magnus, F Henrik, A Chris, and M Stephen. 2011. Capturing Thin Features in Smoke Simulations. Siggraph Talk (2011).Google Scholar
35. Michael Mathieu, Camille Couprie, and Yann LeCun. 2015. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05440 (2015).Google Scholar
36. Antoine McNamara, Adrien Treuille, Zoran Popović, and Jos Stam. 2004. Fluid Control Using the Adjoint Method. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3 (2004), 449–456. Google ScholarDigital Library
37. Mehdi Mirza and Simon Osindero. 2014. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 (2014).Google Scholar
38. Lukas Mosser, Olivier Dubrule, and Martin J Blunt. 2017. Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks. arXiv:1704.03225 (2017).Google Scholar
39. Rahul Narain, Jason Sewall, Mark Carlson, and Ming C. Lin. 2008. Fast Animation of Turbulence Using Energy Transport and Procedural Synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 5 (2008), article 166. Google ScholarDigital Library
40. Augustus Odena, Vincent Dumoulin, and Chris Olah. 2016. Deconvolution and Checker-board Artifacts. Distill (2016).Google Scholar
41. Zherong Pan, Jin Huang, Yiying Tong, Changxi Zheng, and Hujun Bao. 2013. Interactive Localized Liquid Motion Editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 6 (Nov. 2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
42. Xue Bin Peng, Glen Berseth, KangKang Yin, and Michiel Van De Panne. 2017. Deeploco: Dynamic locomotion skills using hierarchical deep reinforcement learning. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4 (2017), 41. Google ScholarDigital Library
43. Lukas Prantl, Boris Bonev, and Nils Thuerey. 2017. Pre-computed Liquid Spaces with Generative Neural Networks and Optical Flow. arXiv:1704.07854 (2017).Google Scholar
44. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. 2016. Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. Proc. ICLR (2016).Google Scholar
45. Nick Rasmussen, Due Quang Nguyen, Willi Geiger, and Ronald Fedkiw. 2003. Smoke Simulation for large scale phenomena. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 22. ACM, 703–707. Google ScholarDigital Library
46. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 234–241.Google ScholarCross Ref
47. Manuel Ruder, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. 2016. Artistic Style Transfer for Videos. In Pattern Recognition – 38th German Conference, GCPR 2016, Hannover, Germany, September 12-15, 2016, Proceedings. 26–36.Google Scholar
48. Masaki Saito, Eiichi Matsumoto, and Shunta Saito. 2017. Temporal generative adversarial nets with singular value clipping. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 2830–2839.Google ScholarCross Ref
49. Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen. 2016. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2234–2242. Google ScholarDigital Library
50. Hagit Schechter and Robert Bridson. 2008. Evolving sub-grid turbulence for smoke animation. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics symposium on Computer animation. Eurographics Association, 1–7. Google ScholarDigital Library
51. Andrew Seile, Ronald Fedkiw, Byungmoon Kim, Yingjie Liu, and Jarek Rossignac. 2008. An Unconditionally Stable MacCormack Method. J. Sci. Comput. 35, 2-3 (June 2008), 350–371. Google ScholarDigital Library
52. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.1409.1556 (2014).Google Scholar
53. Jos Stam. 1999. Stable Fluids. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH. ACM, 121–128. Google ScholarDigital Library
54. Jonathan Tompson, Kristofer Schlachter, Pablo Sprechmann, and Ken Perlin. 2016. Accelerating Eulerian Fluid Simulation With Convolutional Networks. arXiv:1607.03597 (2016).Google Scholar
55. Kiwon Um, Xiangyu Hu, and Nils Thuerey. 2017. Splash Modeling with Neural Networks. arXiv:1704.04456 (2017).Google Scholar
56. Lantao Yu, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, and Yong Yu. 2017. SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradient.. In AAAI. 2852–2858.Google Scholar
57. Hang Zhao, Orazio Gallo, Iuri Frosio, and Jan Kautz. 2015. Loss Functions for Neural Networks for Image Processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08861 (2015).Google Scholar
58. Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros. 2017. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. arXiv:1703.10593 (2017).Google Scholar
