“Poisson image editing” by Perez, Blake and Gangnet

  • ©Patrick Perez, Andrew Blake, and Michel Gangnet

Conference:


Type:


Title:

    Poisson image editing

Presenter(s)/Author(s):



Abstract:


    Using generic interpolation machinery based on solving Poisson equations, a variety of novel tools are introduced for seamless editing of image regions. The first set of tools permits the seamless importation of both opaque and transparent source image regions into a destination region. The second set is based on similar mathematical ideas and allows the user to modify the appearance of the image seamlessly, within a selected region. These changes can be arranged to affect the texture, the illumination, and the color of objects lying in the region, or to make tileable a rectangular selection.

References:


    1. ADOBE©. 2002. Photoshop© 7.0 User Guide. Adobe Systems Incorporated.Google Scholar
    2. BALLESTER, C., BERTALMIO, M., CASELLES, V., SAPIRO, G., AND VERDERA, J. 2001. Filling-in by Joint Interpolation of Vector Fields and Gray Levels. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 10, 8, 1200–1211. Google ScholarDigital Library
    3. BARRET, A., AND CHENEY, A. 2002. Object-Based Image Editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 777–784. Google Scholar
    4. BERTALMIO, M., SAPIRO, G., CASELLES, V., AND BALLESTER, C. 2000. Image Inpainting. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New-York, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 417–424. Google Scholar
    5. BOLZ, J., FARMER, I., GRINPSUN, E., AND SCHRÖDER, P. 2003. Sparse Matrix Solvers on the GPU: Conjugate Gradients and Multigrid. ACM Transactions on Graphics. to appear. Google Scholar
    6. BORNARD, R., LECAN, E., LABORELLI, L., AND CHENOT, J.-H. 2002. Missing Data Correction in Still Images and Image Sequences. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Google Scholar
    7. BURT, P., AND ADELSON, E. 1983. A Multiresolution Spline with Application to Image Mosaics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2, 4, 217–236. Google ScholarDigital Library
    8. EFROS, A., AND FREEMAN, W. 2001. Image Quilting for Texture Synthesis and Transfer. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press/ACM SIGGRAPH, New-York, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 341–346. Google Scholar
    9. EFROS, A., AND LEUNG, T. 1999. Texture Synthesis by Non-Parametric Sampling. In Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Vision, 1033–1038. Google Scholar
    10. ELDER, J., AND GOLDBERG, R. 2001. Image Editing in the Contour Domain. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 23, 3, 291–296. Google ScholarDigital Library
    11. FATTAL, R., LISCHINSKI, D., AND WERMAN, M. 2002. Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 249–256. Google ScholarDigital Library
    12. HERTZMANN, A., JACOBS, C., OLIVER, N., CURLESS, B., AND SALESIN, D. 2001. Image Analogies. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New-York, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM, 327–340. Google Scholar
    13. LAND, E., AND MCCANN, J. 1971. Ligthness and Retinex Theory. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 61, 1–11.Google ScholarCross Ref
    14. LEWIS, J., 2001. Lifting Detail from Darkness. SIGGRAPH 2001 Tech Sketch.Google Scholar
    15. MALLAT, S., AND ZHONG, S. 1992. Characterization of Signals from Multi-Scale Edges. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 14, 710–732. Google ScholarDigital Library


ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page: