“On the semantics of the assignment statement of high-level graphical languages” by Schrack

  • ©Guenther Schrack




    On the semantics of the assignment statement of high-level graphical languages



    Based on the concept of treating graphical data as a data type in its own right with associated language parts and constructs such as graphical constants, graphical variables and graphical expressions, the semantics of the assignment statement of a high-level graphical programming language are investigated in some detail.It is assumed that the graphical data are defined by the areal external representation model. In addition, the semantics of binary operators, the superposition and the deletion operators, are considered.


    1. Toby S. Berk, “TUNA: A high level graphical programming language”, Florida International University, Mathematical Sciences Department, Technical Report, (February 1973), 65pp.Google Scholar
    2. Lawrence Flon, “Program design with abstract data types”, Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report, (June 1975), 33pp.Google Scholar
    3. William M. Newman, “Display Procedures”, Communications of the ACM, 14 (October 1971), p. 651-660. Google ScholarDigital Library
    4. John E. Rieber and Alan C. Shaw, “Interactive picture generation and manipulation through formal descriptions”, Computers and Graphics, 1(May 1975), p. 95-107.Google Scholar
    5. Guenther Schrack, “Design, implementation and experiences with a higher-level graphics language for interactive computer-aided design purposes”, Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH-ACM), 10 (Spring 1976), p. 10-17. Google ScholarDigital Library
    6. David N. Smith, “GPL/I – A PL/I extension for computer graphics”, AFIPS Conference Proceedings (SJCC), 38 (1971), p. 511-528.Google Scholar
    7. T. R. Stack and S. T. Walker, “AIDS – Advanced interactive display system”, AFIPS Conference Proceedings (SJCC), 38 (1971), p. 113-121.Google Scholar
    8. B. L. M. Wyvill, “GROAN: An introduction to a general purpose graphics language”, The University of Bradford, U.K., Internal Report (revised June 1974), 28pp.Google Scholar

ACM Digital Library Publication:

Overview Page: