“Expressive AI” by Mateas

  • ©Michael Mateas

Conference:


Title:

    Expressive AI

Presenter(s):



Abstract:


    The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has produced a rich set of technical practices and interpretive conventions for building machines whose behavior can be narrated as intelligent activity. Artists have begun to incorporate AI practices into cultural production – into the production of artifacts and experiences that function as art within the cultural field. In this paper, I describe my own practice of AI-based cultural production: expressive AI. I will attempt to provide a preliminary understanding of this practice by both situating expressive AI with respect to other discourses on AI and by working inductively from my own Al-based art work. I will first provide a brief description of three of my AI-based art pieces. These will serve as concrete examples to ground the rest of the discussion. I will then describe the expressive AI practice by first situating it with respect to the GOFAl/interactionist AI debate, then by describing the central organizing metaphors of authorial and interpretive affordance, and finally by providing a preliminary set of desiderata for expressive AI practice.

References:


    1. Adam, A. (1998). Artificial knowing: Gender and the thinking machine. London: Routledge.

    2. Agre, P. (1997). Computation and human experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    3. Bates, J. (1992). Virtual reality, art, and entertainment. Presence: The Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1 (1), 133-138.

    4. Boehlen, M., & Mateas, M. (1998). Office plant #1: Intimate space and contemplative entertainment. Leonardo, 31 (s), 345-348.

    5. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without reason. A.I. Memo 1293, Artificial Intelligence Lab., MIT.

    6. Brooks, R. (1990). Elephants don’t play chess. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6, 3-15.

    7. Carbonell, J. (1979). Subjective understanding: Computer models of belief systems. Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Department, Yale University, New Haven.

    8. Special Issue on Situated Cognition. (1993). Cognitive Science 17.

    9. Domike, S., Mateas, M., & Vanouse, P. The recombinant history apparatus presents: Terminal time. Forthcoming in book from the Center for Twentieth Century Studies.

    10. Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    11. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to human perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    12. Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.

    13. Kosko, B. (1997). Fuzzy engineering (pp. 499-525). New York: Simon & Schuster.

    14. Loyall, A. B. & Bates, J. (1991). Hap: A reactive, adaptive architecture for agents. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-147, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.

    15. Mateas, M., Vanouse, P., Domike S. (1999). Terminal time: An ideologically-biased history machine. AISB Quarterly, Special Issue on Creativity in the Arts and Sciences, 102, 36-43.

    16. Mateas, M. (1999). Not your grandmother’s game: AI-based art and entertainment. Working notes of the AI and Computer Games Symposium, AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Menlo Park, California. AAAI Press, 1999.

    17. Mateas, M. (1997). Computational subjectivity in virtual world avatars. Working notes of the Socially Intelligent Agents Symposium, AAAI Fall Symposium Series. Menlo Park, California. AAAI Press., 1997.

    18. Mateas, M. (1997). An Oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents. Technical report CMU-CS-97-156. Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University.

    19. Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine learning (p. 180). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    20. Neal Reilly, W. S. (1996). Believable social and emotional agents. Doctoral dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    21. Norman, D. (1998). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

    22. Sengers, P. (1998). Anti-boxology: Agent design in cultural context. Doctoral dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    23. Stern, A., Frank, A., Resner, B. (1998). Virtual petz: A hybrid approach to creating autonomous, lifelike dogz and catz. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 334-335. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.

    24. Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1999). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (7th ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press. Electronic


Type:



Art Paper/Presentation Type: