“Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display” by Ledda, Chalmers, Troscianko and Seetzen

  • ©Patrick Ledda, Alan Chalmers, Tom Troscianko, and Helge Seetzen




    Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display



    Tone mapping operators are designed to reproduce visibility and the overall impression of brightness, contrast and color of the real world onto limited dynamic range displays and printers. Although many tone mapping operators have been published in recent years, no thorough psychophysical experiments have yet been undertaken to compare such operators against the real scenes they are purporting to depict. In this paper, we present the results of a series of psychophysical experiments to validate six frequently used tone mapping operators against linearly mapped High Dynamic Range (HDR) scenes displayed on a novel HDR device. Individual operators address the tone mapping issue using a variety of approaches and the goals of these techniques are often quite different from one another. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was not simply to determine which is the “best” algorithm, but more generally to propose an experimental methodology to validate such operators and to determine the participants’ impressions of the images produced compared to what is visible on a high contrast ratio display.


    1. David, H. A. 1969. The Method of Paired Comparisons. Charles Griffin and Company. London.Google Scholar
    2. Devlin, K., Chalmers, A., Wilkie, A., and Purgathofer, W. 2002. Star report on tone reproduction and physically based spectral rendering. In Eurographics 2002,Google Scholar
    3. Drago, F., Myszkowski, K., Annen, T., and Chiba, N. 2003. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. In Proc. of EUROGRAPHICS 2003, P. Brunet and D. W. Fellner, Eds., vol. 22 of Computer Graphics Forum, 419–426.Google Scholar
    4. Drago, F., Martens, W. L., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators. In ACM SIGGRAPH Conference Abstracts and Applications. Google ScholarDigital Library
    5. Durand, F., and Dorsey, J. 2000. Interactive tone mapping. In Rendering Techniques 2000 (Proceedings of the Eleventh Eurographics Workshop on Rendering), B. Peroche and H. Rushmeier, Eds., 219–230. Google ScholarDigital Library
    6. Durand, F., and Dorsey, J. 2002. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’02, ACM Press, 257–266. Google ScholarDigital Library
    7. Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., and Werman, M. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’02, ACM Press, 249–256. Google ScholarDigital Library
    8. Ferwerda, J. A., Pattanaik, S. N., Shirley, P., and Greenberg, D. P. 1996. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’96, ACM Press, 249–258. Google ScholarDigital Library
    9. Johnson, G., and Fairchild, M. 2003. Rendering hdr images. In Proceedings of IS & T/SID 11th Color Imaging Conference, 36–41.Google Scholar
    10. Kendall, M. G., and Babington-Smith, B. 1940. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 31, 324–345.Google ScholarCross Ref
    11. Kendall, M. 1975. Rank Correlation Methods, 4th ed. Griffin Ltd.Google Scholar
    12. Kuang, J., Yamaguchi, H., Johnson, G., and Fairchild, M. 2004. Testing hdr image rendering algorithms. In In proceedings of IS and T/SID 12th Color Imaging Conference.Google Scholar
    13. Larson, G. W., Rushmeier, H., and Piatko, C. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 3, 4, 291–306. Google ScholarDigital Library
    14. Ledda, P., Chalmers, A., and Seetzen, H. 2004. Hdr displays: a validation against reality. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.Google Scholar
    15. Ledda, P., Chalmers, A., and Seetzen, H. 2004. A psychophysical validation of tone mapping operators using a high dynamic range display (poster). Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. Google ScholarDigital Library
    16. Ledda. P., Santos, L. P., and Chalmers, A. 2004. A local model of eye adaptation for high dynamic range images. In In Proceedings of ACM AFRIGRAPH ’04, ACM Press, 151–160. Google ScholarDigital Library
    17. Pattanaik, S. N., Ferwerda, J. A., Fairchild, M. D., and Greenberg, D. P. 1998. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’98, ACM Press, 287–298. Google ScholarDigital Library
    18. Pattanaik, S. N., Tumblin, J., Yee, H., and Greenberg, D. P. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, ACM Press, 47–54. Google ScholarDigital Library
    19. Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O. 1988. Biometrika tables for statisticians, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, vol. 1.Google Scholar
    20. Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., and Ferwerda, J. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ’02, ACM Press, 267–276. Google ScholarDigital Library
    21. Schlick, C. 1994. Quantization techniques for the visualization of high dynamic range pictures. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 7–20.Google Scholar
    22. Seetzen, H., Whitehead, L., and Ward, G. 2003. A high dynamic range display system using low and high resolution modulators. In Proc. of the 2003 Society for Information Display Symposium. Google ScholarDigital Library
    23. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGrall-Hill International.Google Scholar
    24. Thurstone, L. L. 1927. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34, 273–286.Google ScholarCross Ref
    25. Tumblin, J., and Rushmeier, H. 1993. Tone reproduction for computer generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 13, 6, 42–48. Google ScholarDigital Library
    26. Tumblin, J., and Turk, G. 1999. LCIS: A boundary hierarchy for detail -preserving contrast reduction. In In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 99, A. Rockwood, Ed., 83–90. Google ScholarDigital Library
    27. Tumblin, J., Hodgins, J., and Guenter, B. 1999. Two methods for display of high contrast images. ACM Transactions on Graphics 18, 3, 56–94. Google ScholarDigital Library
    28. Upstill, S. D. 1985. The realistic presentation of synthetic images: image processing in computer graphics. PhD thesis. Google ScholarDigital Library
    29. Ward. G. 1994. A contrast-based scalefactor for luminance display. Graphics Gems IV., 415–421. Google ScholarDigital Library
    30. Yoshida, A., Blanz, V., Myszkowski, K., and Seidel, H.-P. 2005. Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes. In SPIE.Google Scholar

ACM Digital Library Publication:

Overview Page: