“Edge‐Aware Point Set Resampling” by Huang, Wu, Gong, Cohen-Or, Ascher, et al. …

  • ©Hui Huang, Shihao Wu, Minglun Gong, Daniel Cohen-Or, Uri Ascher, and Hao Zhang

Conference:


Type:


Title:

    Edge‐Aware Point Set Resampling

Session/Category Title:   Points


Presenter(s)/Author(s):


Moderator(s):



Abstract:


    Points acquired by laser scanners are not intrinsically equipped with normals, which are essential to surface reconstruction and point set rendering using surfels. Normal estimation is notoriously sensitive to noise. Near sharp features, the computation of noise-free normals becomes even more challenging due to the inherent undersampling problem at edge singularities. As a result, common edge-aware consolidation techniques such as bilateral smoothing may still produce erroneous normals near the edges. We propose a resampling approach to process a noisy and possibly outlier-ridden point set in an edge-aware manner. Our key idea is to first resample away from the edges so that reliable normals can be computed at the samples, and then based on reliable data, we progressively resample the point set while approaching the edge singularities. We demonstrate that our Edge-Aware Resampling (EAR) algorithm is capable of producing consolidated point sets with noise-free normals and clean preservation of sharp features. We also show that EAR leads to improved performance of edge-aware reconstruction methods and point set rendering techniques.

References:


    1. Adamson, A. and Alexa, M. 2006. Point-sampled cell complexes. ACM Trans. on Graph. 25, 3, 671–689.
    2. Alexa, M., Behr, J., Cohen-or, D., Fleishman, S., Levin, D., and Silva, C. T. 2001. Point set surfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graph. 21–28.
    3. Alexa, M., Behr, J., Cohen-Or, D., Fleishman, S., Levin, D., and Silva, C. T. 2003. Computing and rendering point set surfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graph. 9, 1, 3–15.
    4. Alliez, P., Cohen-Steiner, D., Tong, Y., and Desbrun, M. 2007. Voronoi-based variational reconstruction of unoriented point sets. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. 39–48.
    5. Avron, H., Sharf, A., Greif, C., and Cohen-Or, D. 2010. ℓ1-sparse reconstruction of sharp point set surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 20, 5, 135.
    6. Carr, J. C., Beatson, R. K., Cherrie, J. B., Mitchell, T. J., Fright, W. R., McCallum, B. C., and Evans, T. R. 2001. Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions. ACM Trans. Graph. 67–76.
    7. Dey, T. and Sun, J. 2006. Normal and feature approximations from noisy point clouds. In Proceedings of the Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4337, 21–32.
    8. Dey, T. K. and Giesen, J. 2001. Detecting undersampling in surface reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational Geometry. 257–263.
    9. Fleishman, S., Cohen-Or, D., and Silva, C. T. 2005. Robust moving least-squares fitting with sharp features. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 544–552.
    10. Fleishman, S., Drori, I., and Cohen-Or, D. 2003. Bilateral mesh denoising. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 950–953.
    11. Gross, M. and Pfister, H. 2007. Point-Based Graphics. Morgan Kaufman.
    12. Guennebaud, G., Barthe, L., and Paulin, M. 2004. Real-Time point cloud refinement. In Proceedings of Symposium on Point-Based Graphics. 41–49.
    13. Guennebaud, G., Germann, M., and Gross, M. 2008. Dynamic sampling and rendering of algebraic point set surfaces. Comput. Graph. Forum (Special Issue of Eurographics). 27, 3, 653–662.
    14. Guennebaud, G. and Gross, M. 2007. Algebraic point set surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 23.
    15. Hildebrandt, K. and Polthier, K. 2004. Anisotropic filtering of non-linear surface features. Comput. Graph. Forum (Special Issue of Eurographics) 23, 3, 391–400.
    16. Hoppe, H., DeRose, T., Duchamp, T., McDonald, J., and Stuetzle, W. 1992. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. ACM Trans. Graph., 71–78.
    17. Huang, H. and Ascher, U. 2008. Surface mesh smoothing, regularization and feature detection. SIAM J. Scient. Comput. 31, 1, 74–93.
    18. Huang, H., Li, D., Zhang, H., Ascher, U., and Cohen-Or, D. 2009. Consolidation of unorganized point clouds for surface reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, 176.
    19. Jones, T., Durand, F., and Desbrun, M. 2003. Non-Iterative, feature preserving mesh smoothing. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 943– 949.
    20. Jones, T. R., Durand, F., and Zwicker, M. 2004. Normal improvement for point rendering. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 24, 53–56.
    21. Kazhdan, M., Bolitho, M., and Hoppe, H. 2006. Poisson surface reconstruction. In Proceedings Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. 61–70.
    22. Lange, C. and Polthier, K. 2005. Anisotropic smoothing of point sets. Comput. Aid. Geom. Des. 22, 7, 680–692.
    23. Lipman, Y., Cohen-Or, D., and Levin, D. 2007a. Data-Dependent MLS for faithful surface approximation. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. 59–67.
    24. Lipman, Y., Cohen-Or, D., Levin, D., and Tal-Ezer, H. 2007b. Parameterization-Free projection for geometry reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 22.
    25. Merigot, Q., Ovsjanikov, M., and Guibas, L. 2009. Robust voronoi-based curvature and feature estimation. In Proceedings of the SIAM/ACM Joint Conference on Geometric and Physical Modeling. 1–12.
    26. Miao, Y., Diaz-Gutierrez, P., Pajarola, R., Gopi, M., and Feng, J. 2009. Shape isophotic error metric controllable re-sampling for point-sampled surfaces. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications. 28–35.
    27. Mitra, N. J., Nguyen, A., and Guibas, L. 2004. Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data. Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl. 14, 4–5, 261–276.
    28. Öztireli, C., Alexa, M., and Gross, M. 2010. Spectral sampling of manifolds. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 5, 168.
    29. Öztireli, C., Guennebaud, G., and Gross, M. 2009. Feature preserving point set surfaces based on non-linear kernel regression. Comp. Graph. Forum 28, 2, 493–501.
    30. Pauly, M., Gross, M., and Kobbelt, L. P. 2002. Efficient simplification of point-sampled surfaces. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization Conference. 163–170.
    31. Pauly, M., Keiser, R., Kobbelt, L. P., and Gross, M. 2003. Shape modeling with point-sampled geometry. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 641–650.
    32. Pfister, H., Zwicker, M., van Baar, J., and Gross, M. 2000. Surfels: Surface elements as rendering primitives. In ACM Trans. Graph. 335–342.
    33. Salman, N., Yvinec, M., and Merigot, Q. 2010. Feature preserving mesh generation from 3D point clouds. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. 29, 5, 1623–1632.
    34. Sun, X., Rosin, P. L., Martin, R. R., and Langbein, F. C. 2007. Fast and effective feature-preserving mesh denoising. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comp. Graph. 13, 5, 925–938.
    35. Vergne, R., Pacanowski, R., Barla, P., Granier, X., and Schlick, C. 2010. Radiance scaling for versatile surface enhancement. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games.
    36. Weber, C., Hahmann, S., and Hagen, H. 2010. Sharp feature detection in point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications. 175–186.

ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page: