“Demystifying the Python-processing Landscape: An Overview of Tools Combining Python and Processing” by Bunn and Carrasco
Conference:
Type:
Entry Number: 36
Title:
- Demystifying the Python-processing Landscape: An Overview of Tools Combining Python and Processing
Presenter(s)/Author(s):
Abstract:
Processing is composed of a programming language and an editor for writing and compiling code, providing a collection of special commands to draw, animate, and handle user input using Java. Python Mode for Processing (also referred to as Processing.py) leverages Jython, a Java implementation of Python, to interface with Processing’s Java core. One can install and activate Python Mode in Processing using a button in the IDE interface. Python Mode enables Python syntax in the IDE (instead of Java) but has its limitations: it is source-compatible with Python 2.7 (not 3+) and does not support CPython libraries (such as NumPy). Several promising new Python-Processing tools have emerged, but this proliferation of alternatives can confuse would-be users. This talk maps out the Python-Processing landscape, offering insight into the different options and providing direction for beginners, teachers, and more accomplished programmers keen to explore Python as a tool for creative coding projects.
References:
T. Bunn. 2021. Learn Python Visually: Creative Coding with Processing.py. No Starch Press. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=eggOEAAAQBAJGoogle Scholar
A. Parrish, B. Fry, and C. Reas. 2016. Getting Started with Processing.py: Making Interactive Graphics with Processing’s Python Mode. Make Community, LLC. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=ddYlDAAAQBAJGoogle Scholar
C. Reas and B. Fry. 2014. Processing: A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=NxwmrgEACAAJGoogle Scholar
Alexandre Barrozo do Amaral Villares and Daniel de Carvalho Moreira. 2017. Python on the Landscape of Programming Tools for Design and Architectural Education. In Blucher Design Proceedings. Editora Blucher, Concepción, Chile, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.5151/sigradi2017-033Google Scholar
