“HyperJumping in Virtual Vancouver: Combating Motion Sickness by Merging Teleporting and Continuous VR Locomotion in an Embodied Hands-Free VR Flying Paradigm” by Riecke, Clement, Adhikari and Quesnel


Notice: Pod Template PHP code has been deprecated, please use WP Templates instead of embedding PHP. has been deprecated since Pods version 2.3 with no alternative available. in /data/siggraph/websites/history/wp-content/plugins/pods/includes/general.php on line 518
  • ©Bernhard E. Riecke, David Clement, Ashu Adhikari, and Denise Quesnel

Conference:


  • SIGGRAPH 2022
  • More from SIGGRAPH 2022:
    Notice: Array to string conversion in /data/siggraph/websites/history/wp-content/plugins/siggraph-archive-plugin/src/next_previous/source.php on line 345
      
    Notice: Array to string conversion in /data/siggraph/websites/history/wp-content/plugins/siggraph-archive-plugin/src/next_previous/source.php on line 345

Type(s):


Entry Number: 07

Title:


    HyperJumping in Virtual Vancouver: Combating Motion Sickness by Merging Teleporting and Continuous VR Locomotion in an Embodied Hands-Free VR Flying Paradigm

Program Title:


    Immersive Pavilion

Presenter(s):


Description:


    Motion sickness, unintuitive navigation, and limited agency are critical issues in VR/XR impeding wide-spread adoption and enjoyable user experiences. To tackle these challenges, we present HyperJump, a novel VR interface merging advantages of continuous locomotion and teleportation/dashing into one seamless, hands-free, and easily learnable user interface supporting both flying and ground-based navigation across multiple scales.

References:


    1. A. Adhikari, D. Zielasko, A. Bretin, M. von der Heyde, E. Kruijff, and B. E. Riecke. 2021. Integrating Continuous and Teleporting VR Locomotion into a Seamless “HyperJump” Paradigm. In IEEE VR. 370–372.
    2. D.A. Bowman, D. Koller, and L.F. Hodges. 1997. Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In IEEE VR. 45–52.
    3. E. Chang, H.T. Kim, and B. Yoo. 2020. Virtual Reality Sickness: A Review of Causes and Measurements. International Journal of HCI 36, 17 (2020), 1658–1682.
    4. J. Clifton and S. Palmisano. 2020. Effects of steering locomotion and teleporting on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based VR. Virtual Reality 24, 3 (2020), 453–468.
    5. Y. Farmani and R.J. Teather. 2020. Evaluating Discrete Viewpoint Control to Reduce Cybersickness in Virtual Reality. Virtual Reality (2020), 1–20.
    6. A.S. Fernandes and S.K. Feiner. 2016. Combating VR Sickness Through Subtle Dynamic Field-Of-View Modification. Proc. of IEEE 3DUI (2016), 201–210.
    7. B. Lawson. 2014. Motion Sickness Symptomatology and Origins. In Handbook of Virtual Environments. Vol. 20143245. CRC Press, 531–600. ch 23.
    8. L. Rebenitsch and C. Owen. 2016. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Reality 20, 2 (2016), 101–125.
    9. B.E. Riecke and J. Schulte-Pelkum. 2015. An Integrative Approach to Presence and Self-Motion Perception Research. In Immersed in Media: Telepresence Theory, Measurement and Technology, Frank et al. Biocca (Ed.). Springer, 187–235.
    10. D. Saredakis, A. Szpak, B. Birckhead, H.A.D. Keage, A. Rizzo, and T. Loetscher. 2020. Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14 (2020).
    11. D. Zielasko, A. Meißner, S. Freitag, B. Weyers, and T.W. Kuhlen. 2018. Dynamic Field of View Reduction Related to Subjective Sickness Measures in an HMD-based Data Analysis Task. In Proc. of IEEE VR Workshop on Everday Virtual Reality. 1–6.

ACM Digital Library Publication:


Overview Page: