“Space-time surface reconstruction using incompressible flow” – ACM SIGGRAPH HISTORY ARCHIVES

“Space-time surface reconstruction using incompressible flow”

  • ©

Conference:


Type(s):


Title:

    Space-time surface reconstruction using incompressible flow

Session/Category Title:   Shape modelling


Presenter(s)/Author(s):



Abstract:


    We introduce a volumetric space-time technique for the reconstruction of moving and deforming objects from point data. The output of our method is a four-dimensional space-time solid, made up of spatial slices, each of which is a three-dimensional solid bounded by a watertight manifold. The motion of the object is described as an incompressible flow of material through time. We optimize the flow so that the distance material moves from one time frame to the next is bounded, the density of material remains constant, and the object remains compact. This formulation overcomes deficiencies in the acquired data, such as persistent occlusions, errors, and missing frames. We demonstrate the performance of our flow-based technique by reconstructing coherent sequences of watertight models from incomplete scanner data.

References:


    1. de Aguiar, E., Zayer, R., Theobalt, C., Magnor, M., and Seidel, H.-P. 2007. Video-driven animation of human body scans. In 3DTV, IEEE, 1–4.Google Scholar
    2. Allen, B., Curless, B., and Popovic, Z. 2002. Articulated body deformation from range scan data. In Siggraph, ACM, 612–619. Google Scholar
    3. Anguelov, D., Koller, D., Pang, H.-C., Srinivasan, P., and Thrun, S. 2004. Recovering Articulated Object Models from 3D Range Data. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, 18–26. Google Scholar
    4. Anguelov, D., Srinivasan, P., Koller, D., Thrun, S., Rodgers, J., and Davis, J. 2005. SCAPE: shape completion and animation of people. Transactions on Graphics 24, 3, 408–416. Google ScholarDigital Library
    5. Anuar, N., and Guskov, I. 2004. Extracting Animated Meshes with Adaptive Motion Estimation. In Vision, Modeling, and Visualization, IOS, 63–71.Google Scholar
    6. Barron, J. L., and Thacker, N. A. 2004. Tutorial: Computing 2D and 3D Optical Flow. Tech. Rep. 012, Tina Memo.Google Scholar
    7. Bradley, D., Popa, T., Sheffer, A., Heidrich, W., and Boubekeur, T. 2008. Markerless Garment Capture. In Siggraph, ACM. Google Scholar
    8. Carranza, J., Theobalt, C., Magnor, M., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Free-viewpoint video of human actors. In Siggraph, ACM, 569–577. Google Scholar
    9. Fong, P., and Buron, F. 2005. Sensing Deforming and Moving Objects with Commercial Off the Shelf Hardware. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 101. Google Scholar
    10. Goldlücke, B., and Magnor, M. 2005. Spacetime-continuous geometry meshes from multi-view video sequences. In International Conference on Image Processing, IEEE, 625–628.Google Scholar
    11. Goldlücke, B., Ihrke, I., Linz, C., and Magnor, M. 2007. Weighted Minimal Hypersurface Reconstruction. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29, 7, 1194–1208. Google ScholarDigital Library
    12. Golub, G. H., and Greif, C. 2003. On solving block structured indefinite linear systems. Journal on Scientific Computing 24, 6, 2076–2092. SIAM.Google ScholarCross Ref
    13. Greif, C., and Schötzau, D. 2006. Preconditioners for Saddle Point Linear Systems with Highly Singular (1,1) Blocks. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis 22, 114–121.Google Scholar
    14. Grosso, E., Sandini, G., and Tistarelli, M. 1989. 3D object reconstruction using stereo and motion. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19, 6, 1465–1476.Google ScholarCross Ref
    15. Gupta, N. C., and Kanal, L. N. 1995. 3D Motion Estimation from Motion Field. Artificial Intelligence 78, 1–2, 45–86. Google ScholarDigital Library
    16. Guskov, I., Klibanov, S., and Bryant, B. 2003. Trackable surfaces. In Symposium on Computer Animation, ACM/Eurographics, 251–257. Google ScholarDigital Library
    17. Hansen, P. C. 1998. Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. SIAM. Google Scholar
    18. Holland, P., and Welsch, R. 1977. Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 6, 9, 813 — 827.Google ScholarCross Ref
    19. Koninckx, T. P., and van Gool, L. J. 2006. Real-Time Range Acquisition by Adaptive Structured Light. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 3, 432–445. Google ScholarDigital Library
    20. Levin, A., Fergus, R., Durand, F., and Freeman, W. 2007. Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture. In Siggraph, ACM, 70. Google Scholar
    21. Magnor, M., and Goldlücke, B. 2004. Spacetime-Coherent Geometry Reconstruction from Multiple Video Streams. In 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, IEEE, 365–372. Google Scholar
    22. Marschner, S. R., Guenter, B. K., and Raghupathy, S. 2000. Modeling and Rendering for Realistic Facial Animation. In Rendering Techniques, Eurographics, 231–242. Google Scholar
    23. Mitra, N. J., Flüry, S., Ovsjanikov, M., Gelfand, N., Guibas, L. J., and Pottmann, H. 2007. Dynamic geometry registration. In Symposium on Geometry Processing, ACM/Eurographics, 173–182. Google ScholarDigital Library
    24. Ohtake, Y., Belyaev, A., Alexa, M., Turk, G., and Seidel, H.-P. 2003. Multi-level partition of unity implicits. In Siggraph, ACM, 463–470. Google Scholar
    25. Pekelny, Y., and Gotsman, C. 2008. Articulated object reconstruction and motion capture from depth video. In Eurographics, Eurographics, to appear.Google Scholar
    26. Rusinkiewicz, S., Hall-Holt, O. A., and Levoy, M. 2002. Real-time 3D model acquisition. In Siggraph, ACM, 438–446. Google Scholar
    27. Sharf, A., Lewiner, T., Shklarski, G., Toledo, S., and Cohen-Or, D. 2007. Interactive topology-aware surface reconstruction. In Siggraph, ACM, 43. Google Scholar
    28. Shinya, M. 2004. Unifying Measured Point Sequences of Deforming Objects. In 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, IEEE, 904–911. Google Scholar
    29. Toledo, S., 2003. TAUCS: A library of sparse linear solvers. version 2.2.Google Scholar
    30. Ullman, S. 1979. The interpretation of structure from motion. Biological Sciences B 203, 1153, 405–426.Google Scholar
    31. Vedula, S., Baker, S., Rander, P., Collins, R. T., and Kanade, T. 1999. Three-Dimensional Scene Flow. In International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE, 722–729. Google ScholarDigital Library
    32. Wand, M., Jenke, P., Huang, Q., Bokeloh, M., Guibas, L. J., and Schilling, A. 2007. Reconstruction of deforming geometry from time-varying point clouds. In Symposium on Geometry Processing, ACM/Eurographics, 49–58. Google ScholarDigital Library
    33. Wang, Y., Gupta, M., 0002, S. Z., Wang, S., Gu, X., Samaras, D., and Huang, P. 2005. High Resolution Tracking of Non-Rigid 3D Motion of Densely Sampled Data Using Harmonic Maps. In International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE, 388–395. Google Scholar
    34. White, R., Crane, K., and Forsyth, D. A. 2007. Capturing and animating occluded cloth. In Siggraph, ACM, 34. Google Scholar
    35. Zhang, L., Brian Curless, B., and Seitz, S. M. 2003. Spacetime faces: high resolution capture for modeling and animation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 367–374.Google Scholar
    36. Zhang, L., Snavely, N., Curless, B., and Seitz, S. M. 2004. Spacetime faces: high resolution capture for modeling and animation. Transactions on Graphics 23, 3, 548–558. Google ScholarDigital Library


ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page:



Submit a story:

If you would like to submit a story about this presentation, please contact us: historyarchives@siggraph.org