“(Projection) Mapping The Brain: A Critical Cartographic Approach To The Artist’s Use Of FMRI To Study The Contemplation Of Death.” by Prophet

  • ©

Conference:


Type(s):


Title:

    (Projection) Mapping The Brain: A Critical Cartographic Approach To The Artist's Use Of FMRI To Study The Contemplation Of Death.

Presenter(s)/Author(s):



Abstract:


    This paper discusses the author’s artwork, Neuro Memento Mori, a self-portrait comprising digital animations and live action video projection-mapped onto a 3D print. The life-sized sculpture of the head and neck, dissected to reveal the artist’s brain, was produced from MRI data gathered as the artist viewed memento mori paintings and meditated on death. The production of the artwork, made with neuroscientists, explores the relationship between the so-called frontier of neuroscience, data and the map. The use of computation to produce neuroimages, 3D prints and projected video is discussed from the perspective of critical cartography. Production of life-sized self-portrait comprising digital animations and live action video projection-mapped onto a 3D print from MRI data gathered as the artist viewed memento mori paintings and meditated on death.

References:


    1. Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., and Frith, C. D. 2010. Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 5995, 1081–1085.

    2. Baumgartner, R., and Somorjai, R. 2001. Graphical display of fmri data: visualizing multidimensional space. Magnetic resonance imaging 19, 2, 283–286.

    3. Carboni, A. 2014. Em:toolkit: cartography as embodied datification. In Media Architecture Biennale, Aarhus University.

    4. Casey, E. S. 2002. Representing Place: Landscape Painting and Maps. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

    5. Ceccarelli, L. 2013. On the frontier of science: An American rhetoric of exploration and exploitation. Michigan State University Press.

    6. Crampton, J. W., and Krygier, J. 2006. An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: an International E-journal for Critical Geographies 4, 1, 11–33.

    7. Crampton, J. W. 2011. Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS, vol. 11. John Wiley & Sons.

    8. De Cambray, B. 1993. Three-dimensional (3d) modelling in a geographical database. In Auto-Carto Conference, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 338–338.

    9. Desmond, J. E., and Chen, S. A. 2002. Ethical issues in the clinical application of fmri: factors affecting the validity and interpretation of activations. Brain and cognition 50, 3, 482–497.

    10. Fine, C. 2010. Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.

    11. Fine, C. 2013. Is there neurosexism in functional neuroimaging investigations of sex differences? Neuroethics 6, 2, 369–409.

    12. Fitzgerald, D., Matusall, S., Skewes, J., and Roepstorff, A. 2014. Whats so critical about critical neuroscience? rethinking experiment, enacting critique. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8.

    13. Frazetto, G., and Anker, S. 2009. Neuroculture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10, 11, 815–821.

    14. Gruber, D., Jack, J., Keranen, L., McKenzie, J. M., and Morris, M. B. 2011. Rhetoric and the neurosciences: Engagement and exploration. Poroi 7, 1, 11–11.

    15. Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies, 575–599.

    16. Haraway, D. J. 1997. Modest Witness Second Millennium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Psychology Press.

    17. Harley, J. B. 1988. Maps, knowledge, and power. In The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, D. Cosgrove and S. Daniels, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    18. Harley, J. B. 1989. Deconstructing the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 26, 2, 1–20.

    19. Harley, J. B. 1990. Maps and the Columbian Encounter: An Interpretive Guide to the Travelling Exhibition. The Golda Meir Library, Milwaukee, WI.

    20. Harris, Y. 2014. Score as relationship. In Sound & Score: Essays on Sound, Score and Notation, P. de Assis, B. Brooks, and K. Coessens, Eds. Leuven University Press, 195–205.

    21. Josipovic, Z., Dinstein, I., Weber, J., and Heeger, D. J. 2011. Influence of meditation on anti-correlated networks in the brain. Frontiers in human neuroscience 5.

    22. Josipovic, Z. 2010. Duality and nonduality in meditation research. Consciousness and cognition 19, 4, 1119–1121.

    23. Kanarinka. 2006. Art-machines, body-ovens and map-recipes: Entries for apsychogeographic dictionary. Cartographic Perspectives 53, 24–40.

    24. Kroos, C., and Herath, D. C. 2012. Evoking agency: Attention model and behavior control in a robotic art installation. Leonardo 45, 5, 401–407.

    25. Krygier, J., and Wood, D. 2009. Ce nest pas le monde (this is not the world). In Rethinking Maps: New frontiers in cartographic theory. 189–220.

    26. Ma, Y., Hof, P. R., Grant, S. C., Blackband, S. J., Bennett, R., Slatest, L., and Benveniste, H. 2005. A three-dimensional digital atlas database of the adult c57bl/6j mouse brain by magnetic resonance microscopy. Neuroscience 135, 4, 1203–1215.

    27. Monmonier, M. S. 1995. Drawing the line: Tales of maps and cartocontroversy. Henry Holt & Co.

    28. Pearlman, E. The volumetric society of new york. http://www.meetup.com/volumetric/?page start=1409876411000.

    29. Propen, A. D. 2011. 7 cartographic representation and the construction of lived worlds. In Rethinking Maps: New Frontiers in Cartographic Theory. 113–130.

    30. Prophet, J. 2016. Self-portrait of the artist meditating on death: Feminist technoscience and the apparatus of contemporary neuroscience experiments. In The Routledge Handbook to Biology in Art and Architecture, C. Terranova and M. Tromble, Eds. Routledge, New York, NY.

    31. Thompson, P. M., Woods, R. P., Mega, M. S., and Toga, A. W. 2000. Mathematical/computational challenges in creating deformable and probabilistic atlases of the human brain. Human brain mapping 9, 2, 81–92.

    32. Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., and Rubin, N. 2012. The brain on art: intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Frontiers in human neuroscience 6.

    33. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., and Gray, J. R. 2008. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of cognitive neuroscience 20, 3, 470–477.

    34. Westhead, R. K., Smith, M., Shelley, W. A., Pedley, R. C., Ford, J., and Napier, B. 2013. Mobile spatial mapping and augmented reality applications for environmental geoscience. Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions 2, 1–4, 185–190.

    35. Zaslavsky, I., Baldock, R. A., and Boline, J. 2014. Cyberinfrastructure for the digital brain: spatial standards for integrating rodent brain atlases. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 8, 1–17.


ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page:


Art Paper/Presentation Type: