“Locally Adaptive Rank-Constrained Optimal Tone Mapping” by Shu and Wu

  • ©

Conference:


Type(s):


Title:

    Locally Adaptive Rank-Constrained Optimal Tone Mapping

Session/Category Title:   Computational Photography

Presenter(s)/Author(s):


Moderator(s):


Abstract:


    High dynamic range (HDR) tone mapping is formulated as an optimization problem of maximizing perceivable spatial details given the limited dynamic range of display devices. This objective can be attained, as supported by our results, by a novel image display methodology called locally adaptive rank-constrained optimal tone mapping (LARCOTM). The scientific basis for LARCOTM is that the maximum discrimination power of human vision system can only be achieved in a relatively small locality of an image. LARCOTM is fundamentally different from existing HDR tone mapping techniques in that the former can preserve pixel value order statistics within localities in which human foveal vision retains maximum sensitivity, while the latter cannot. As a result, images enhanced by LARCOTM are free of artifacts such as halos and double edges that plague other HDR methods.

References:


    1. Edward H. Adelson. 2000. Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In The New Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd ed.). MIT Press, 339–351.Google Scholar
    2. Sos Agaian, Blair Silver, and Karen Panetta. 2007. Transform coefficient histogram-based image enhancement algorithms using contrast entropy. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 3 (2007), 741–758. Google ScholarDigital Library
    3. Mathieu Aubry, Sylvain Paris, Samuel W. Hasinoff, Jan Kautz, and Frédo Durand. 2014. Fast local laplacian filters: Theory and applications. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 33, 5 (2014), 167:1–167:14. Google ScholarDigital Library
    4. J. Ed Barnes. 1992. Characteristics and control of contrast in CT. Radiographics 12, 4 (1992), 825–837.Google ScholarCross Ref
    5. T. Celik and T. Tjahjadi. 2011. Contextual and variational contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 12 (2011), 3431–3441. Google ScholarDigital Library
    6. Hadar Cohen-Duwek, Hedva Spitzer, Rony Weitzen, and Sara Apter. 2011. A biologically-based algorithm for companding computerized tomography (CT) images. Comput. Biol. Med. 41, 6 (2011), 367–379. Google ScholarDigital Library
    7. DDE 2016. Digital Detail Enhancement (DDE) Technical Note. Retrieved from http://www.flirmedia.com/MMC/CVS/Tech_Notes/TN_0003_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
    8. Zeev Farbman, Raanan Fattal, Dani Lischinski, and Richard Szeliski. 2008. Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3 (2008), 67:1–67:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
    9. Raanan Fattal. 2009. Edge-avoiding wavelets and their applications. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 3 (2009), 1–10. Google ScholarDigital Library
    10. Raanan Fattal, Dani Lischinski, and Michael Werman. 2002. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3 (2002), 249–256. Google ScholarDigital Library
    11. Ajo John, Walter Huda, Ernest M. Scalzetti, Kent M. Ogden, and Marsha L. Roskopf. 2004. Performance of a single lookup table (LUT) for displaying chest CT images. Acad. Radiol. 11, 6 (2004), 609–619.Google ScholarCross Ref
    12. Y. T. Kim. 1997. Enhancement using brightness preserving bi-histogram equalization. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 43, 1 (1997), 1–8. Google ScholarDigital Library
    13. Tom Kimpe and Tom Tuytschaever. 2007. Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems—How much is enough? J. Dig. Imag. 20, 4 (2007), 422–432.Google ScholarCross Ref
    14. E. H. Land and J. J. McCann. 1971. Lightness and retinex theory. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 61, 1 (1971), 1–11.Google ScholarCross Ref
    15. G. W. Larson, H. Rushmeier, and C. Piatko. 1997. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 3, 4 (1997), 291–306. Google ScholarDigital Library
    16. Zhenhao Li and Xiaolin Wu. 2014. Contrast enhancement with chromaticity error bound. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’14). IEEE, 4507–4511.Google ScholarCross Ref
    17. RafałMantiuk, Scott Daly, and Louis Kerofsky. 2008. Display adaptive tone mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3 (2008), 68:1–68:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
    18. Rafat Mantiuk, Kil Joong Kim, Allan G. Rempel, and Wolfgang Heidrich. 2011. HDR-VDP-2: A calibrated visual metric for visibility and quality predictions in all luminance conditions. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 30. ACM, 40. Google ScholarDigital Library
    19. RafałMantiuk, Karol Myszkowski, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2006. A perceptual framework for contrast processing of high dynamic range images. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 3, 3 (2006), 286–308. Google ScholarDigital Library
    20. A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, and T. G. Stockham Jr.1968. Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 16, 3 (1968), 437–466.Google ScholarCross Ref
    21. Sylvain Paris, Samuel W. Hasinoff, and Jan Kautz. 2011. Local laplacian filters: Edge-aware image processing with a laplacian pyramid. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4 (2011), 68:1–68:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
    22. Ziaur Rahman and Glenn A. Woodell. 2004. Retinex processing for automatic image enhancement. J. Electron. Imag. 13 (2004), 100–110.Google ScholarCross Ref
    23. Erik Reinhard, Michael Stark, Peter Shirley, and James Ferwerda. 2002. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3 (2002), 267–276. Google ScholarDigital Library
    24. E. Reinhard, G. Ward, S. Pattanaik, and P. Debevec. 2005. High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display, and Image-Based Lighting. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
    25. Xiao Shu and Xiaolin Wu. 2013. Image enhancement revisited: From first order to second order statistics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’13). IEEE, 886–890.Google ScholarCross Ref
    26. J. A. Stark. 2000. Adaptive image contrast enhancement using generalizations histogram equalization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 5 (2000), 889–896. Google ScholarDigital Library
    27. Martin Čadík, Michael Wimmer, Laszlo Neumann, and Alessandro Artusi. 2008. Evaluation of HDR tone mapping methods using essential perceptual attributes. Comput. Graph. 32, 3 (2008), 330–349. Google ScholarDigital Library
    28. Y. Wang, Q. Chen, and B. Zhang. 1999. Image enhancement based on equal area dualistic sub-image histogram equalization method. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 45, 1 (1999), 68–75. Google ScholarDigital Library
    29. X. Wu. 2011. A linear programming approach for optimal contrast-tone mapping. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 5 (2011), 1262–1272. Google ScholarDigital Library
    30. Hojatollah Yeganeh and Zhou Wang. 2013. Objective quality assessment of tone-mapped images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22, 2 (2013), 657–667. 

ACM Digital Library Publication:


Overview Page: