“Evaluating the Effectiveness of Configurable Virtual Reality System for Multi-sensory Spatial Audio Training” by Choi, Edralin, Tang, Harmon and Roy
Conference:
Type(s):
Title:
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Configurable Virtual Reality System for Multi-sensory Spatial Audio Training
Session/Category Title:
- Augmented & Virtual Reality
Presenter(s)/Author(s):
Abstract:
This paper presents EARSIM, a new approach to auditory localization training through Virtual Reality, utilizing a configurable multi-sensory cue system to enable adaptive and personalized difficulty levels. The proposed system addresses the limitations of conventional localization techniques and demonstrates potential as a flexible platform for future clinical applications in auditory rehabilitation. INVITED TO THE FIRST ROUND OF THE STUDENT RESEARCH COMPETITION
References:
[1] Aurelie Coudert, Gregoire Verdelet, Karen Reilly, Eric Truy, and Valérie Gaveau. 2022. Intensive Training of Spatial Hearing Promotes Auditory Abilities of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Adults: A Pilot Study. Ear & Hearing Publish Ahead of Print (08 2022).
[2] Jill B. Firszt, Ruth M. Reeder, Noël Y. Dwyer, Harold Burton, and Laura K. Holden. 2015. Localization training results in individuals with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Hearing Research 319 (Jan. 2015), 48–55.
[3] Bhavisha J. Parmar, Marina Salorio-Corbetto, Lorenzo Picinali, Merle Mahon, Ruth Nightingale, Sarah Somerset, Helen Cullington, Sandra Driver, Christine Rocca, Dan Jiang, and Deborah Vickers. 2024. Virtual reality games for spatial hearing training in children and young people with bilateral cochlear implants: the “Both Ears (BEARS)” approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience Volume 18 – 2024 (2024).
[4] David Passig and Sigal Eden. 2001. Virtual Reality as a Tool for Improving Spatial Rotation among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4, 6 (2001), 681–686. arXiv: PMID: 11800175.
[5] Ann E. Perreau, Hua Ou, Richard Tyler, and Camille Dunn. 2014. Self‐reported spatial hearing abilities across different cochlear implant profiles. American Journal of Audiology 23, 4 (Dec. 2014), 374–384.
