“Wave-ray coupling for interactive sound propagation in large complex scenes” by Yeh, Mehra, Ren, Antani, Manocha, et al. … – ACM SIGGRAPH HISTORY ARCHIVES

“Wave-ray coupling for interactive sound propagation in large complex scenes” by Yeh, Mehra, Ren, Antani, Manocha, et al. …

  • 2013 SA Technical Papers_Yeh_Wave-Ray Coupling for Interactive Sound Propagation in Large Complex Scenes

Conference:


Type(s):


Title:

    Wave-ray coupling for interactive sound propagation in large complex scenes

Session/Category Title:   Light & Sound


Presenter(s)/Author(s):



Abstract:


    We present a novel hybrid approach that couples geometric and numerical acoustic techniques for interactive sound propagation in complex environments. Our formulation is based on a combination of spatial and frequency decomposition of the sound field. We use numerical wave-based techniques to precompute the pressure field in the near-object regions and geometric propagation techniques in the far-field regions to model sound propagation. We present a novel two-way pressure coupling technique at the interface of near-object and far-field regions. At runtime, the impulse response at the listener position is computed at interactive rates based on the stored pressure field and interpolation techniques. Our system is able to simulate high-fidelity acoustic effects such as diffraction, scattering, low-pass filtering behind obstruction, reverberation, and high-order reflections in large, complex indoor and outdoor environments and Half-Life 2 game engine. The pressure computation requires orders of magnitude lower memory than standard wave-based numerical techniques.

References:


    1. Antani, L., Chandak, A., Savioja, L., and Manocha, D. 2012. Interactive sound propagation using compact acoustic transfer operators. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 1 (Feb.), 7:1–7:12.
    2. Aretz, M. 2012. Combined wave and ray based room acoustic simulations of small rooms: challenges and limitations on the way to realistic simulation results. PhD thesis, Aachener Beitrge zur Technischen Akustik.
    3. Arfken, G. B., Weber, H. J., and Ruby, L. 1985. Mathematical methods for physicists, vol. 3. Academic press San Diego.
    4. Barbone, P. E., Montgomery, J. M., Michael, O., and Harari, I. 1998. Scattering by a hybrid asymptotic/finite element method. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 164, 1, 141–156.
    5. Ben-Artzi, A., Egan, K., Durand, F., and Ramamoorthi, R. 2008. A precomputed polynomial representation for interactive BRDF editing with global illumination. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 27, 2, 13.
    6. Blauert, J. 1983. Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization. MIT Press (Cambridge, Mass.).
    7. Botteldooren, D. 1994. Acoustical finite-difference time-domain simulation in a quasi-Cartesian grid. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95, 2313.
    8. Funkhouser, T., Carlbom, I., Elko, G., Pingali, G., Sondhi, M., and West, J. 1998. A beam tracing approach to acoustic modeling for interactive virtual environments. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 1998, 21–32.
    9. Funkhouser, T., Tsingos, N., and Jot, J.-M. 2004. Survey of methods for modeling sound propagation in interactive virtual environment systems. Presence.
    10. Granier, E., Kleiner, M., Dalenbck, B.-I., and Svensson, P. 1996. Experimental auralization of car audio installations. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 44, 10, 835–849.
    11. Gumerov, N. A., and Duraiswami, R. 2004. Fast multipole methods for the Helmholtz equation in three dimensions. Elsevier Science.
    12. Gumerov, N. A., and Duraiswami, R. 2009. A broadband fast multipole accelerated boundary element method for the three-dimensional helmholtz equation. J. Acoustical Society of America 125, 1, 191–205.
    13. Hampel, S., Langer, S., and Cisilino, A. P. 2008. Coupling boundary elements to a raytracing procedure. International journal for numerical methods in engineering 73, 3, 427–445.
    14. James, D. L., Barbic, J., and Pai, D. K. 2006. Precomputed acoustic transfer: output-sensitive, accurate sound generation for geometrically complex vibration sources. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 987–995.
    15. Jean, P., Noe, N., and Gaudaire, F. 2008. Calculation of tyre noise radiation with a mixed approach. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 94, 1, 91–103.
    16. Kouyoumjian, R. G., and Pathak, P. H. 1974. A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface. Proc. of IEEE 62 (Nov.), 1448–1461.
    17. Lentz, T., Schroeder, D., Vorlander, M., and Assenmacher, I. 2007. Virtual reality system with integrated sound field simulation and reproduction. EURASIP J. Applied Signal Processing.
    18. Lokki, T., Southern, A., Siltanen, S., and Savioja, L. 2011. Studies of epidaurus with a hybrid room acoustics modeling method. In Acoustics of Ancient Theaters Patras, Greece.
    19. Mehra, R., Raghuvanshi, N., Antani, L., Chandak, A., Curtis, S., and Manocha, D. 2013. Wave-based sound propagation in large open scenes using an equivalent source formulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 2 (Apr.), 19:1–19:13.
    20. Murphy, D., Shelley, S., Beeson, M., Moore, A., and Southern, A. 2008. Hybrid room impulse response synthesis in digital waveguide mesh based room acoustics simulations. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-08).
    21. Ochmann, M. 1995. The source simulation technique for acoustic radiation problems. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 81, 6, 512–527.
    22. Pierce, A. D. 1989. Acoustics: an introduction to its physical principles and applications. Acoustical Society of America.
    23. Raghuvanshi, N., Narain, R., and Lin, M. C. 2009. Efficient and Accurate Sound Propagation Using Adaptive Rectangular Decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 5, 789–801.
    24. Raghuvanshi, N., Snyder, J., Mehra, R., Lin, M., and Govindaraju, N. 2010. Precomputed wave simualtion for real-time sound propagation of dynamic sources in complex scenes. ACM Trans. on Graphics (Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH) 29, 3.
    25. Southern, A., Siltanen, S., and Savioja, L. 2011. Spatial room impulse responses with a hybrid modeling method. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 130.
    26. Svensson, U. P., Fred, R. I., and Vanderkooy, J. 1999. An analytic secondary source model of edge diffraction impulse responses. J. Acoustical Society of America 106, 5, 2331–2344.
    27. Taylor, M., Chandak, A., Qi Mo, Lauterbach, C., Schissler, C., and Manocha, D. 2012. Guided multiview ray tracing for fast auralization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 18, 11 (Nov.), 1797–1810.
    28. Thompson, L. L. 2006. A review of finite-element methods for time-harmonic acoustics. J. Acoustical Society of America 119, 3, 1315–1330.
    29. Tsingos, N., Funkhouser, T., Ngan, A., and Carlbom, I. 2001. Modeling acoustics in virtual environments using the uniform theory of diffraction. In Proc. SIGGRAPH 2001, 545–552.
    30. Tsingos, N. 2009. Pre-computing geometry-based reverberation effects for games.35th AES Conference on Audio for Games.
    31. Vladimirov, V. S. 1976. Generalized functions in mathematical physics. Moscow Izdatel Nauka 1.
    32. Vorlander, M. 1989. Simulation of the transient and steady-state sound propagation in rooms using a new combined raytracing/image-source algorithm. J. Acoustical Society of America 86, 1, 172–178.
    33. Wang, Y., Safavi-Naeini, S., and Chaudhuri, S. 2000. A hybrid technique based on combining ray tracing and FDTD methods for site-specific modeling of indoor radio wave propagation. Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on 48, 5 (May), 743–754.
    34. Waterman, P. C. 2009. T-matrix methods in acoustic scattering. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 1, 42–51.


ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page:



Submit a story:

If you would like to submit a story about this presentation, please contact us: historyarchives@siggraph.org