“Texture amendment: reducing texture distortion in constrained parameterization” – ACM SIGGRAPH HISTORY ARCHIVES

“Texture amendment: reducing texture distortion in constrained parameterization”

  • ©

Conference:


Type(s):


Title:

    Texture amendment: reducing texture distortion in constrained parameterization

Session/Category Title:   Texture


Presenter(s)/Author(s):



Abstract:


    Constrained parameterization is an effective way to establish texture coordinates between a 3D surface and an existing image or photograph. A known drawback to constrained parameterization is visual distortion that arises when the 3D geometry is mismatched to highly textured image regions. This paper introduces an approach to reduce visual distortion by expanding image regions via texture synthesis to better fit the 3D geometry. The result is a new amended texture that maintains the essence of the input texture image but exhibits significantly less distortion when mapped onto the 3D model.

References:


    1. Bae, S., Paris, S., and Durand, F. 2006. Two-scale tone management for photographic look. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    2. Balmelli, L., Taubin, G., and Bernardini, F. 2002. Space-optimized texture maps. Computer Graphics Forum 21, 3.Google ScholarCross Ref
    3. Bertalmio, M., Sapiro, G., Ballester, C., and Caselles, V. 2000. Image inpainting. In SIGGRAPH 2000, 417–424. Google Scholar
    4. Deng, Y., and S. Manjunath, B. 2001. Unsupervised segmentation of color-texture regions in images and video. PAMI 23, 8 (Aug), 800–810. Google ScholarDigital Library
    5. Desbrun, M., Meyer, M., and Alliez, P. 2002. Intrinsic parameterizations of surface meshes. In Eurographics.Google Scholar
    6. Fang, H., and Hart, J. C. 2007. Detail preserving shape deformation in image editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    7. Graphite. http://alice.loria.fr/index.php/software/3-platform/22-graphite.html.Google Scholar
    8. Kraevoy, V., Sheffer, A., and Gotsman, C. 2003. Matchmaker: constructing constrained texture maps. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    9. Kwatra, V., Schodl, A., Essa, I., Turk, G., and Bobick, A. 2003. Graphcut textures: Image and video synthesis using graph cuts. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    10. Lefebvre, S., and Hoppe, H. 2006. Appearance-space texture synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 25, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    11. Levin, A., Lischinski, D., and Weiss, Y. 2004. Colorization using optimization. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    12. Lévy, B., Sylvain, P., Nicolas, R., and Jerome, M. 2002. Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    13. Lévy, B. 2001. Constrained texture mapping for polygonal meshes. In SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
    14. Liu, Y., Lin, W., and Hays, J. 2004. Near-regular texture analysis and manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    15. Maillot, J., Yahia, H., and Verroust, A. 1993. Interactive texture mapping. In SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
    16. Malik, J., and Rosenholtz, R. 1997. Computing local surface orientation and shape from texture for curved surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision 23, 2 (June), 149–168. Google ScholarDigital Library
    17. Perez, P., Gangnet, M., and Blake, A. 2003. Poisson image editing. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    18. Sander, P., Gortler, S., Snyder, J., and Hoppe, H. 2002. Signal-specialized parameterization. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Google ScholarDigital Library
    19. Sheffer, A., Lévy, B., Mogilnitsky, M., and Bogomyakov, A. 2005. Abf++: fast and robust angle based flattening. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 2, 311–330. Google ScholarDigital Library
    20. Solder, C., Cani, M., and Angelidia, A. 2002. Hierarchical pattern mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3. Google Scholar
    21. Sun, J., Yuan, L., Jia, J., and Shum, H.-Y. 2005. Image completion with structure propagation. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3, 861–868. Google ScholarDigital Library
    22. Tong, X., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Wang, X., Guo, B., and Shum, H.-Y. 2002. Synthesis of bidirectional texture functions on arbitrary surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    23. Wang, L., Gu, X., Mueller, K., and Yau, S.-T. 2005. Uniform texture synthesis and texture mapping using global parameterization. The Visual Computer 21, 8, 801–810.Google ScholarCross Ref
    24. Wei, L.-Y., and Levoy, M. 2001. Texture synthesis over arbitrary manifold surfaces. In SIGGRAPH. Google Scholar
    25. Wu, Q., and Yu, Y. 2004. Feature matching and deformation for texture synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    26. Zhang, J., Zhou, K., Belho, L., Guo, B., and Shum, H.-Y. 2003. Synthesis of progressively-variant textures on arbitrary surfaces. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
    27. Zhang, E., Mischaikow, K., and Turk, G. 2005. Feature-based surface parameterization and texture mapping. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 1, 1–27. Google ScholarDigital Library
    28. Zhou, K., Wang, X., Tong, Y., Desbrun, M., Guo, B., and Shum, H.-Y. 2005. Texture montage: Seamlessly texturing of arbitrary surfaces from multiple images. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3. Google ScholarDigital Library


ACM Digital Library Publication:



Overview Page:



Submit a story:

If you would like to submit a story about this presentation, please contact us: historyarchives@siggraph.org