“Gradient-domain volumetric photon density estimation” by Gruson, Gruson, Vibert, Nowrouzezahrai and Hachisuka
Conference:
Type:
Entry Number: 82
Title:
- Gradient-domain volumetric photon density estimation
Session/Category Title: Volume Rendering and Global Illumination
Presenter(s)/Author(s):
Moderator(s):
Abstract:
Gradient-domain rendering can improve the convergence of surface-based light transport by exploiting smoothness in image space. Scenes with participating media exhibit similar smoothness and could potentially benefit from gradient-domain techniques. We introduce the first gradient-domain formulation of image synthesis with homogeneous participating media, including four novel and efficient gradient-domain volumetric density estimation algorithms. We show that naïve extensions of gradient domain path-space and density estimation methods to volumetric media, while functional, can result in inefficient estimators. Focussing on point-, beam- and plane-based gradient-domain estimators, we introduce a novel shift mapping that eliminates redundancies in the naïve formulations using spatial relaxation within the volume. We show that gradient-domain volumetric rendering improve convergence compared to primal domain state-of-the-art, across a suite of scenes. Our formulation and algorithms support progressive estimation and are easy to incorporate atop existing renderers.
References:
1. Pablo Bauszat, Victor Petitjean, and Elmar Eisemann. 2017. Gradient-Domain Path Reusing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. of SIGGRAPH Asia) (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
2. Pravin Bhat, Brian Curless, Michael Cohen, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2008. Fourier Analysis of the 2D Screened Poisson Equation for Gradient Domain Problems. In The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Google ScholarDigital Library
3. Benedikt Bitterli and Wojciech Jarosz. 2017. Beyond Points and Beams: Higher-Dimensional Photon Samples for Volumetric Light Transport. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. of SIGGRAPH) (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
4. Eva Cerezo, Frederic Perez-Cazorla, Xavier Pueyo, Francisco Seron, and François Sillion. 2005. A Survey on Participating Media Rendering Techniques. The Visual Computer (2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
5. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. 2013. Radiative Transfer. Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
6. Carsten Dachsbacher, Jaroslav Křivánek, Miloš Hašan, Adam Arbree, Bruce Walter, and Jan Novák. 2014. Scalable Realistic Rendering with Many-Light Methods. Computer Graphics Forum (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
7. Iliyan Georgiev, Jaroslav Krivanek, Toshiya Hachisuka, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2013. Joint importance sampling of low-order volumetric scattering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
8. Toshiya Hachisuka, Iliyan Georgiev, Wojciech Jarosz, Jaroslav Křivánek, and Derek Nowrouzezahrai. 2017. Extended Path Integral Formulation for Volumetric Transport. In Proc. of EGSR (Experimental Ideas & Implementations).Google Scholar
9. Toshiya Hachisuka and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2009. Stochastic progressive photon mapping. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2009). Google ScholarDigital Library
10. Toshiya Hachisuka, Jacopo Pantaleoni, and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2012. A path space extension for robust light transport simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
11. Miloš Hašan, Jaroslav Křivánek, Bruce Walter, and Kavita Bala. 2009. Virtual Spherical Lights for Many-light Rendering of Glossy Scenes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2009). Google ScholarDigital Library
12. Louis G Henyey and Jesse Leonard Greenstein. 1941. Diffuse radiation in the galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal 93 (1941).Google Scholar
13. Binh-Son Hua, Adrien Gruson, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Toshiya Hachisuka. 2017. Gradient-Domain Photon Density Estimation. Computer Graphics Forum (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
14. Wenzel Jakob. 2010. Mitsuba Renderer. (2010).Google Scholar
15. Wenzel Jakob. 2013. Light Transport on Path-Space Manifolds. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cornell University.Google Scholar
16. Wenzel Jakob and Steve Marschner. 2012. Manifold exploration: a Markov chain Monte Carlo technique for rendering scenes with difficult specular transport. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
17. Wojciech Jarosz, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Iman Sadeghi, and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2011a. A Comprehensive Theory of Volumetric Radiance Estimation Using Photon Points and Beams. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
18. Wojciech Jarosz, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Robert Thomas, Peter-Pike Sloan, and Matthias Zwicker. 2011b. Progressive photon beams. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
19. Wojciech Jarosz, Matthias Zwicker, and Henrik Wann Jensen. 2008. The Beam Radiance Estimate for Volumetric Photon Mapping. Computer Graphics Forum (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
20. Henrik Wann Jensen. 2001. Realistic image synthesis using photon mapping. Google ScholarDigital Library
21. Henrik Wann Jensen and Per H Christensen. 1998. Efficient simulation of light transport in scenes with participating media using photon maps. In SIGGRAPH.Google Scholar
22. James T. Kajiya. 1986. The Rendering Equation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (1986). Google ScholarDigital Library
23. Markus Kettunen, Marco Manzi, Miika Aittala, Jaakko Lehtinen, Frédo Durand, and Matthias Zwicker. 2015. Gradient-domain path tracing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
24. Claude Knaus and Matthias Zwicker. 2011. Progressive photon mapping: A probabilistic approach. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
25. Jaroslav Křivánek, Iliyan Georgiev, Toshiya Hachisuka, Petr Vévoda, Martin Šik, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2014. Unifying points, beams, and paths in volumetric light transport simulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
26. Christopher Kulla and Marcos Fajardo. 2012. Importance Sampling Techniques for Path Tracing in Participating Media. Computer Graphics Forum (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
27. Eric P Lafortune and Yves D Willems. 1996. Rendering participating media with bidirectional path tracing. In Rendering Techniques. Google ScholarDigital Library
28. Jaakko Lehtinen, Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, Miika Aittala, Frédo Durand, and Timo Aila. 2013. Gradient-domain metropolis light transport. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2013). Google ScholarDigital Library
29. Marco Manzi, Markus Kettunen, Miika Aittala, Jaakko Lehtinen, Frédo Durand, and Matthias Zwicker. 2015. Gradient-domain bidirectional path tracing. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (2015).Google Scholar
30. Marco Manzi, Markus Kettunen, Frédo Durand, Matthias Zwicker, and Jaakko Lehtinen. 2016a. Temporal gradient-domain path tracing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2016). Google ScholarDigital Library
31. M. Manzi, D. Vicini, and M. Zwicker. 2016b. Regularizing Image Reconstruction for Gradient-Domain Rendering with Feature Patches. Computer Graphics Forum (2016).Google Scholar
32. Tomas Möller and Ben Trumbore. 1997. Fast, Minimum Storage Ray-triangle Intersection. Journal of Graphics Tools (1997). Google ScholarDigital Library
33. Jan Novák, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Carsten Dachsbacher, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2012a. Progressive virtual beam lights. In Computer Graphics Forum. Google ScholarDigital Library
34. Jan Novák, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Carsten Dachsbacher, and Wojciech Jarosz. 2012b. Virtual ray lights for rendering scenes with participating media. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2012). Google ScholarDigital Library
35. Fabrice Rousselle, Wojciech Jarosz, and Jan Novák. 2016. Image-space Control Variates for Rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2016). Google ScholarDigital Library
36. Weilun Sun, Xin Sun, Nathan A Carr, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, and Ravi Ramamoorthi. 2017. Gradient-Domain Vertex Connection and Merging. (2017).Google Scholar
